Author |
Message |
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: At 'Em Arizona Fans! |
|
|
As-built or post-refit, with the blisters is what I think he's asking.
As-built or post-refit, with the blisters is what I think he's asking.
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 06, 2025 11:14 am |
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: At 'Em Arizona Fans! |
|
|
Hi ffg-7 any:) Thanks
Hi ffg-7 any:) Thanks
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 06, 2025 5:02 am |
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: At 'Em Arizona Fans! |
|
|
what time period?
what time period?
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 04, 2025 10:56 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: At 'Em Arizona Fans! |
|
|
Hello everybody
I just started to build USS Pennsylvania 1:200 paper model from publisher Flynavy model fro Ukraine. I would like to ask You if somebody have any drawings for shell platting of hull for uss arizoa of sister ship for underwater part of hull thanks best regards
Hello everybody
I just started to build USS Pennsylvania 1:200 paper model from publisher Flynavy model fro Ukraine. I would like to ask You if somebody have any drawings for shell platting of hull for uss arizoa of sister ship for underwater part of hull thanks best regards
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 04, 2025 12:47 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: At 'Em Arizona Fans! |
|
|
I don't have drawings, but my Mk 19 page may have some helpful photos.
I don't have drawings, but [url=http://www.researcheratlarge.com/Ships/Misc/Mk19Director/]my Mk 19 page[/url] may have some helpful photos.
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 19, 2024 11:02 am |
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: At 'Em Arizona Fans! |
|
|
Thanks, I thought they would be different types!
Regarding Rangefinders/Directors, does anybody have drawings of he Mark 19 DP Director/Rangefinder?
Thanks, I thought they would be different types!
Regarding Rangefinders/Directors, does anybody have drawings of he Mark 19 DP Director/Rangefinder?
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 19, 2024 9:42 am |
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: At 'Em Arizona Fans! |
|
|
with the information that Tracy just provided, the Mark 6 Type P catapult is the deck mounted version whereas the Mark 4 mod 1 Type P is the turret mount catapult.
with the information that Tracy just provided, the Mark 6 Type P catapult is the deck mounted version whereas the Mark 4 mod 1 Type P is the turret mount catapult.
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 16, 2024 10:51 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: At 'Em Arizona Fans! |
|
|
From a May 1942 Pearl Harbor Navy Yard report on salvaged Ordnance materials - note that the count is *one* on each.
Attachments: |
1942-5-7 PHNY Salvage Report.PNG [ 139.68 KiB | Viewed 66 times ]
|
1942-5-7 PHNY Salvage Report 02.PNG [ 168.37 KiB | Viewed 66 times ]
|
From a May 1942 Pearl Harbor Navy Yard report on salvaged Ordnance materials - note that the count is *one* on each.
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 16, 2024 9:41 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: At 'Em Arizona Fans! |
|
|
They could still be P-6 catapults, just mounted differently. The mountings for naval guns, radar, and, I'd expect, catapults, often had their own Mark #.
I am curious, though, about the P-6: I keep reading that P-6 was the standard for US WWII ships, but aren't the ones mounted on the fast battleships longer than the ones on the cruisers and the slow battleships? Is there a P-6 Mod-# series that might rack some of these variations?
- Sean F.
They could still be P-6 catapults, just mounted differently. The mountings for naval guns, radar, and, I'd expect, catapults, often had their own Mark #.
I am curious, though, about the P-6: I keep reading that P-6 was the standard for US WWII ships, but aren't the ones mounted on the fast battleships longer than the ones on the cruisers and the slow battleships? Is there a P-6 Mod-# series that might rack some of these variations?
- Sean F.
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 16, 2024 8:38 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: At 'Em Arizona Fans! |
|
|
Based on the official plans it's not Type P the rotating structure is around at the half point of the catapult not 2/3rd or 3/5th aft:
Based on the official plans it's not Type P the rotating structure is around at the half point of the catapult not 2/3rd or 3/5th aft: [img]https://i.imgur.com/XRdEbZk.jpeg[/img] [img]https://i.imgur.com/c13otiG.jpeg[/img]
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 16, 2024 3:35 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: At 'Em Arizona Fans! |
|
|
Just in case it is of interest / helpful, the "Type P" catapults were powder fired, as opposed to the hydraulic "Type H" that aircraft carriers used. http://www.navsource.org/archives/01/57l.htm
Just in case it is of interest / helpful, the "Type P" catapults were powder fired, as opposed to the hydraulic "Type H" that aircraft carriers used.
http://www.navsource.org/archives/01/57l.htm
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 16, 2024 12:44 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: At 'Em Arizona Fans! |
|
|
Type P Mark 6 catapult?
Attachments: |
Type P Mark 6 catapult.jpg [ 336.83 KiB | Viewed 128 times ]
|
Type P Mark 6 catapult?
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 16, 2024 10:33 am |
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: At 'Em Arizona Fans! |
|
|
As I cannot search in a certain topic, I had to ask. What is the designation of the Pennsylvania class catapults in their 1930's state (Aka Arizona's catapults) both the turret top and stern catapults?
As I cannot search in a certain topic, I had to ask. What is the designation of the Pennsylvania class catapults in their 1930's state (Aka Arizona's catapults) both the turret top and stern catapults?
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 16, 2024 9:32 am |
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: At 'Em Arizona Fans! |
|
|
Anybody know where I can find some 700th scale range clock pieces, or range clock decals?
Anybody know where I can find some 700th scale range clock pieces, or range clock decals?
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 13, 2024 10:44 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: At 'Em Arizona Fans! |
|
|
Hi Jon! Judging by the post attack footage where we can see that the face plates on the Forward fighting top were removed and the side plates on the Main fighting top were removed, I'd say there was definitely something in there that they salvaged out of the tops.
Hi Jon! Judging by the post attack footage where we can see that the face plates on the Forward fighting top were removed and the side plates on the Main fighting top were removed, I'd say there was definitely something in there that they salvaged out of the tops.
[url=https://postimg.cc/D8rP9M76][img]https://i.postimg.cc/ZKgsyGgG/Screen-Shot-2023-04-27-at-10-03-19-PM.png[/img][/url] [url=https://postimg.cc/47Z0R5c5][img]https://i.postimg.cc/vB6w92Hp/Screen-Shot-2024-12-01-at-4-13-27-PM.png[/img][/url]
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 01, 2024 4:15 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: At 'Em Arizona Fans! |
|
|
Sorry, I should have been more specific. I was wondering about the directors in the fighting tops. Was it possible that when the new enclosed directors appeared, that it was just an empty space up there, or were they still there? Just wondering.
Sorry, I should have been more specific. I was wondering about the directors in the fighting tops. Was it possible that when the new enclosed directors appeared, that it was just an empty space up there, or were they still there? Just wondering.
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 01, 2024 1:38 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: At 'Em Arizona Fans! |
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 01, 2024 12:27 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: At 'Em Arizona Fans! |
|
|
you mean these? https://www.model-monkey.com/product-page/1-350-mk-19-fire-control-directors
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 01, 2024 11:03 am |
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: At 'Em Arizona Fans! |
|
|
What gun directors were used on the Arizona and has anyone ever seen a picture or drawings of them. Would be nice if there were 1/350 offerings of them.
What gun directors were used on the Arizona and has anyone ever seen a picture or drawings of them. Would be nice if there were 1/350 offerings of them.
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 01, 2024 10:36 am |
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: At 'Em Arizona Fans! |
|
|
It's very possible that the two were distinct nomenclature in USN drawings at the time, but I haven't seen supporting documentation to confirm it. It's one of the fun things about going through the plans though, seeing new nomenclature or specific uses of it and learning more about the design and thoughts that went into the ships.
It's very possible that the two were distinct nomenclature in USN drawings at the time, but I haven't seen supporting documentation to confirm it. It's one of the fun things about going through the plans though, seeing new nomenclature or specific uses of it and learning more about the design and thoughts that went into the ships.
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 30, 2024 11:57 pm |
|
|
|