Author |
Message |
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: Calling all Arethusa class fans |
 |
|
Hello.
It seems that the torpedotubes have a roof/deck over them. They are pumping out water/oil mix from the hull. Must have been desperate hours... Maybe they tried to tilt the ship from side to side.
I found a photo from Lofoten, com. Taken later and showing more colours! There are two dark colours on the splintershields. Dark grey and black? Or is that brown?
Attachments: |

IMG_20240509_075838.jpg [ 71.73 KiB | Viewed 927 times ]
|
Hello.
It seems that the torpedotubes have a roof/deck over them. They are pumping out water/oil mix from the hull. Must have been desperate hours... Maybe they tried to tilt the ship from side to side.
I found a photo from Lofoten, com. Taken later and showing more colours! There are two dark colours on the splintershields. Dark grey and black? Or is that brown?
|
|
|
 |
Posted: Thu May 09, 2024 12:14 am |
|
|
 |
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: Calling all Arethusa class fans |
 |
|
I had a lazy sunday with lady Penelope. She is in 1/350 scale. I will use catapult and other details from Eduard's York set. As before, some company will soon announce theirs... 
Attachments: |

IMG_20240505_210202.jpg [ 1.62 MiB | Viewed 1908 times ]
|

IMG_20240505_210219.jpg [ 1.62 MiB | Viewed 1908 times ]
|
I had a lazy sunday with lady Penelope. She is in 1/350 scale. I will use catapult and other details from Eduard's York set.
As before, some company will soon announce theirs... :rolf_3:
|
|
|
 |
Posted: Sun May 05, 2024 1:16 pm |
|
|
 |
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: Calling all Arethusa class fans |
 |
|
The question is when that photo was made.
Penelope run aground off Fleinvær Light and was towed by Eskimo to Skjelfjord.
The photo is labelled with tug "Sterkodderin". Geiir Haarr mentions in The Battle for Norway the Norwegian repair vessel Stærkodder. This ship arrived at the 13th of April in Skjelfjord - i.e. if the label refers to that ship and is correct, it would have been taken on the 13th of April or after. That would indicate that before she run aground, she was painted Home Fleet Grey... Really boring...
The question is when that photo was made.
[i]Penelope[/i] run aground off Fleinvær Light and was towed by [i]Eskimo[/i] to Skjelfjord.
The photo is labelled with tug "Sterkodderin". Geiir Haarr mentions in [i]The Battle for Norway[/i] the Norwegian repair vessel [i]Stærkodder[/i]. This ship arrived at the 13th of April in Skjelfjord - i.e. if the label refers to that ship and is correct, it would have been taken on the 13th of April or after. That would indicate that before she run aground, she was painted Home Fleet Grey... Really boring...
|
|
|
 |
Posted: Sat Apr 27, 2024 8:33 am |
|
|
 |
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: Calling all Arethusa class fans |
 |
|
drasticplastic wrote: drasticplastic wrote: So what were the colors and camo pattern BEFORE grounding, or at the beginning of the Second Battle for Narvik? Want to paint her at that period.  Overall Home Fleet Gray?? How boring! 
Attachments: |
File comment: Life is boring sometimes. Penelope on the rocks!!

1600-x-981-hms-penelope-assisted-by-the-tug-sterkodderin-in-v0-zqfye7s9ghy91.jpg [ 47.36 KiB | Viewed 2005 times ]
|
[quote="drasticplastic"][quote="drasticplastic"]So what were the colors and camo pattern BEFORE grounding, or at the beginning of the Second Battle for Narvik? Want to paint her at that period. :wave_1:[/quote]
Overall Home Fleet Gray?? How boring! :wave_1:[/quote]
|
|
|
 |
Posted: Sat Apr 27, 2024 6:53 am |
|
|
 |
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: Calling all Arethusa class fans |
 |
|
DavidP wrote: https://www.world-war.co.uk/Arethusa/arethusa_class.php https://www.world-war.co.uk/Arethusa/aurora.phpThank you David. I did come across these photos earlier, but none of them gave enough close-ups for a definite answer.
[quote="DavidP"]https://www.world-war.co.uk/Arethusa/arethusa_class.php https://www.world-war.co.uk/Arethusa/aurora.php[/quote]
Thank you David. I did come across these photos earlier, but none of them gave enough close-ups for a definite answer.
|
|
|
 |
Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2022 12:19 am |
|
|
 |
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: Calling all Arethusa class fans |
 |
|
graham wrote: Hi HJ1985 I have a few Wright & Logan photos of her entering Portsmouth in 1945, their good close ups from various angles and I cant see any pom-pom director and type 282
Graham Thank you Graham, this is really helpful. Avagoodweekend!
[quote="graham"]Hi HJ1985 I have a few Wright & Logan photos of her entering Portsmouth in 1945, their good close ups from various angles and I cant see any pom-pom director and type 282
Graham[/quote]
Thank you Graham, this is really helpful. Avagoodweekend!
|
|
|
 |
Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2022 12:18 am |
|
|
 |
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: Calling all Arethusa class fans |
 |
|
Hi HJ1985 I have a few Wright & Logan photos of her entering Portsmouth in 1945, their good close ups from various angles and I cant see any pom-pom director and type 282
Graham
Hi HJ1985 I have a few Wright & Logan photos of her entering Portsmouth in 1945, their good close ups from various angles and I cant see any pom-pom director and type 282
Graham
|
|
|
 |
Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2022 10:40 pm |
|
|
 |
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: Calling all Arethusa class fans |
 |
|
Hi all fans
Did HMS Aurora have pom-pom director and type 282 radar? don't think Flyhalk models these parts in its 1945 version.
Hi all fans
Did HMS Aurora have pom-pom director and type 282 radar? don't think Flyhalk models these parts in its 1945 version.
|
|
|
 |
Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2022 7:21 pm |
|
|
 |
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: Calling all Arethusa class fans |
 |
|
Guest,
You might like to read the attachment to Dick's 8.58am Post of December 2020 on the "RN Ships' bottoms and boot-topping 1914 1950" thread as a starter on this one.
Guest,
You might like to read the attachment to Dick's 8.58am Post of December 2020 on the "RN Ships' bottoms and boot-topping 1914 1950" thread as a starter on this one.
|
|
|
 |
Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2022 8:49 am |
|
|
 |
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: Calling all Arethusa class fans |
 |
|
Hello to all the Royal Navy fans.
British ships are known to have been painted three different colors below the waterline during WW2: gray, black and red. However, it is unclear when and what color was every particular ship painted. Therefore, I would like to ask if anyone can confirm exactly what color was HMS Aurora painted below the waterline as of 1945. I need this info to paint the model of said ship by Flyhawk.
Thank you in advance.
Hello to all the Royal Navy fans.
British ships are known to have been painted three different colors below the waterline during WW2: gray, black and red. However, it is unclear when and what color was every particular ship painted. Therefore, I would like to ask if anyone can confirm exactly what color was HMS Aurora painted below the waterline as of 1945. I need this info to paint the model of said ship by Flyhawk.
Thank you in advance.
|
|
|
 |
Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2022 4:36 pm |
|
|
 |
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: Calling all Arethusa class fans |
 |
|
Fivi_1241 wrote: Hi guys, I was thinking about buying HMS Aurora and backdating it to 1944 landing in southern France or maybe even further back in time, but I can't find any sources on how Aurora looked like back then. Links on the first page of this topic aren't very precise either.
Are changes in light AA the only ones to occur on Aurora in the last year of war? And what would her camouflage be in 1944? I absolutely love Admiralty Standard Scheme, but I don't think Aurora could be painted that way during operation Dragoon. So, the best I can do is point you to this link. https://www.iwm.org.uk/collections/item ... 1060020124 Aurora was part of Operation Slapstick, the allies occupation of Taranto, and was a cameraship for a assigned film crew. There is something like 30 mins of footage that you can comb through that may give you the camoflauge pattern aurora wore in 1943.
[quote="Fivi_1241"]Hi guys, I was thinking about buying HMS Aurora and backdating it to 1944 landing in southern France or maybe even further back in time, but I can't find any sources on how Aurora looked like back then. Links on the first page of this topic aren't very precise either.
Are changes in light AA the only ones to occur on Aurora in the last year of war? And what would her camouflage be in 1944? I absolutely love Admiralty Standard Scheme, but I don't think Aurora could be painted that way during operation Dragoon.[/quote]
So, the best I can do is point you to this link.
https://www.iwm.org.uk/collections/item/object/1060020124
Aurora was part of Operation Slapstick, the allies occupation of Taranto, and was a cameraship for a assigned film crew. There is something like 30 mins of footage that you can comb through that may give you the camoflauge pattern aurora wore in 1943.
|
|
|
 |
Posted: Fri Jan 21, 2022 8:35 am |
|
|
 |
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: Calling all Arethusa class fans |
 |
|
All: Flyhawk's 1/700 HMS Penelope kit has the 4" HA AA gun deck atop the aft deckhouse covered entirely with wooden planks. See here (scroll down): https://toylandhobbymodelingmagazine.pr ... ll-review/But most, if not all RN cruisers from this period had steel decks atop their aft deckhouses, with just the working areas around any AA guns there covered by wood planking. See, for instance, these pictures of HMAS Sydney: https://www.navy.gov.au/hmas-sydney-ii-part-5 (scroll down a bit to get to the photos). Norman Ough's plans of HMS Penelope seem to show the deck covered completely by wooden planks (though it is hard to tell here): https://www.vintagemodelplans.com/produ ... io-controlBut this Norman Ough model held by the IWM shows the aft deckhouse covered by a steel AA deck, painted in dark gray: https://www.iwm.org.uk/collections/item/object/30018157So would anyone have any photos or reliable plans of HMS Penelope that could clarify this matter? Any assistance in this matter would be greatly appreciated, as I hoped that the Flyhawk HMS Penelope would be a quick build, but as usual, complications quickly pile up... sigh, LOL! Thanks! Mike E.
All:
Flyhawk's 1/700 HMS Penelope kit has the 4" HA AA gun deck atop the aft deckhouse covered entirely with wooden planks. See here (scroll down):
https://toylandhobbymodelingmagazine.press/2017/09/20/flyhawk-model-1700-fh1109-hms-penelope-1940-deluke-edition-full-review/
But most, if not all RN cruisers from this period had steel decks atop their aft deckhouses, with just the working areas around any AA guns there covered by wood planking. See, for instance, these pictures of HMAS Sydney: https://www.navy.gov.au/hmas-sydney-ii-part-5 (scroll down a bit to get to the photos).
Norman Ough's plans of HMS Penelope seem to show the deck covered completely by wooden planks (though it is hard to tell here):
https://www.vintagemodelplans.com/products/full-size-printed-plans-scale-1-96-arethusa-class-light-cruiser-h-m-s-penelope-l-63-suitable-for-radio-control
But this Norman Ough model held by the IWM shows the aft deckhouse covered by a steel AA deck, painted in dark gray:
https://www.iwm.org.uk/collections/item/object/30018157
So would anyone have any photos or reliable plans of HMS Penelope that could clarify this matter?
Any assistance in this matter would be greatly appreciated, as I hoped that the Flyhawk HMS Penelope would be a quick build, but as usual, complications quickly pile up... sigh, LOL!
Thanks!
Mike E.
|
|
|
 |
Posted: Sun Jun 14, 2020 9:55 am |
|
|
 |
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: Calling all Arethusa class fans |
 |
|
Hi guys, I was thinking about buying HMS Aurora and backdating it to 1944 landing in southern France or maybe even further back in time, but I can't find any sources on how Aurora looked like back then. Links on the first page of this topic aren't very precise either.
Are changes in light AA the only ones to occur on Aurora in the last year of war? And what would her camouflage be in 1944? I absolutely love Admiralty Standard Scheme, but I don't think Aurora could be painted that way during operation Dragoon.
Hi guys, I was thinking about buying HMS Aurora and backdating it to 1944 landing in southern France or maybe even further back in time, but I can't find any sources on how Aurora looked like back then. Links on the first page of this topic aren't very precise either.
Are changes in light AA the only ones to occur on Aurora in the last year of war? And what would her camouflage be in 1944? I absolutely love Admiralty Standard Scheme, but I don't think Aurora could be painted that way during operation Dragoon.
|
|
|
 |
Posted: Mon Mar 09, 2020 7:03 am |
|
|
 |
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: Calling all Arethusa class fans |
 |
|
Thanks Tim. I thought it must be, otherwise they wouldn't have been able to turn it on either beam.
thanks Mike
Thanks Tim. I thought it must be, otherwise they wouldn't have been able to turn it on either beam.
thanks Mike
|
|
|
 |
Posted: Sun Aug 12, 2018 5:30 am |
|
|
 |
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: Calling all Arethusa class fans |
 |
|
According to Theo Ballance The Squadrons and Units of the Fleet Air Arm (Tonbridge: Air-Britain, 2016), she carried an EIIIH catapult from completion until it was removed during her repairs after the Norwegian campaign (August 1940). The "E" means extendible.
She was allocated one Seafox (serial K8588) throughout.
According to Theo Ballance [i]The Squadrons and Units of the Fleet Air Arm[/i] (Tonbridge: Air-Britain, 2016), she carried an EIIIH catapult from completion until it was removed during her repairs after the Norwegian campaign (August 1940). The "E" means extendible.
She was allocated one Seafox (serial K8588) throughout.
|
|
|
 |
Posted: Sun Aug 12, 2018 1:48 am |
|
|
 |
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: Calling all Arethusa class fans |
 |
|
I'm Building Flyhawk's HMS Penelope, prior to the Norwegian campaign. Was the catapult telescopic and which is the correct aircraft for her in the first few months of the war, the Seafox or Walrus?
thanks Mike
I'm Building Flyhawk's HMS Penelope, prior to the Norwegian campaign. Was the catapult telescopic and which is the correct aircraft for her in the first few months of the war, the Seafox or Walrus?
thanks Mike
|
|
|
 |
Posted: Sat Aug 11, 2018 5:31 pm |
|
|
 |
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: Calling all Arethusa class fans |
 |
|
Regarding the camouflage of Penelope in 1940: a photo in HMS Pepperpot shows that the light colour (white) was added before she got the heavy list, because the dirt is clearly over the light colour. This indicates the camouflage was NOT applied during the repairs, but before. But when? Still in Scapa Flow? Could it be an experimental camouflage for coastal areas, perhaps even both for winter in Scapa Flow (is there snow??) and in Norway...
Regarding the camouflage of Penelope in 1940: a photo in HMS [i]Pepperpot[/i] shows that the light colour (white) was added before she got the heavy list, because the dirt is clearly over the light colour. This indicates the camouflage was NOT applied during the repairs, but before. But when? Still in Scapa Flow? Could it be an experimental camouflage for coastal areas, perhaps even both for winter in Scapa Flow (is there snow??) and in Norway...
|
|
|
 |
Posted: Sat Jan 13, 2018 11:40 am |
|
|
 |
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: Calling all Arethusa class fans |
 |
|
From what I can understand, Aurora’s 1945 fit was primarily due to her 1943 refit. At the end of Aerthusa’s 1944 repair/refit, was she very similar to Aurora’s fit with the exception quad 40s replacing the quad 2 pounders? Where can I find a resource for Arethusa's 1944 fit? Thanks, Rich
From what I can understand, Aurora’s 1945 fit was primarily due to her 1943 refit. At the end of Aerthusa’s 1944 repair/refit, was she very similar to Aurora’s fit with the exception quad 40s replacing the quad 2 pounders? Where can I find a resource for Arethusa's 1944 fit? Thanks, Rich
|
|
|
 |
Posted: Thu Nov 23, 2017 10:38 pm |
|
|
 |
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: Calling all Arethusa class fans |
 |
|
If an argument can be made that Penelope had been repainted in Home Fleet Gray before leaving Scapa, then wouldn't a temporary scheme of white over the gray have been more appropriate than white and brown against the backdrop of the steep bare-sided cliffs of the Norwegian fiords? Just trying to rule out the possibility of the Home Fleet Gray scheme. 
If an argument can be made that Penelope had been repainted in Home Fleet Gray before leaving Scapa, then wouldn't a temporary scheme of white over the gray have been more appropriate than white and brown against the backdrop of the steep bare-sided cliffs of the Norwegian fiords? Just trying to rule out the possibility of the Home Fleet Gray scheme. :wave_1:
|
|
|
 |
Posted: Thu Nov 23, 2017 11:07 am |
|
|
 |
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: Calling all Arethusa class fans |
 |
|
Assuming IF Penelope was wearing the Flotta Scheme, which contained brown and white (and light gray, light green, and black) up until being grounded, could the grays, greens, and black have been overpainted with more white leaving only the brown and white areas as pictured? 
Assuming IF Penelope was wearing the Flotta Scheme, which contained brown and white (and light gray, light green, and black) up until being grounded, could the grays, greens, and black have been overpainted with more white leaving only the brown and white areas as pictured? :wave_1:
|
|
|
 |
Posted: Wed Nov 22, 2017 11:30 am |
|
|
 |