Rigging thickness compared to radio

Post a reply

Confirmation code
Enter the code exactly as it appears. All letters are case insensitive.
Smilies
:smallsmile: :wave_1: :big_grin: :thumbs_up_1: :heh: :cool_1: :cool_2: :woo_hoo:
View more smilies

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Rigging thickness compared to radio

Re: Rigging thickness compared to radio

by StevenVD » Sun Jun 21, 2026 4:09 pm

Here my Zuikaku island and radio masts in 1/350. I use 2 thicknesses of Uschi thread (now Mig).

Image

Image

Image

Image

Re: Rigging thickness compared to radio

by Bob the Stug » Thu Jun 18, 2026 11:25 am

Thanks Dan and Rick

1/700 my eyes would pop out at that scale lol

Using resin to attach infini thread, learning as I go

Bob

Re: Rigging thickness compared to radio

by Rick E Davis » Wed Jun 17, 2026 7:52 pm

In 1/700 scale and likely in 1/350 scale as well, ALL RIGGING in scale is impossible to see. I know just my opinion, but I don't bother with it.

Re: Rigging thickness compared to radio

by Dan K » Wed Jun 17, 2026 6:25 pm

Probably. Wire tends to be thinner for the same strength as, say, a halyard.

In 1/700, it would be hard to distinguish between the two.

Re: Rigging thickness compared to radio

by Bob the Stug » Wed Jun 17, 2026 3:55 pm

WW2, sorry. Most navies especially IJN

Re: Rigging thickness compared to radio

by FFG-7 » Wed Jun 17, 2026 3:52 pm

what ship & time period?

Rigging thickness compared to radio

by Bob the Stug » Wed Jun 17, 2026 2:34 pm

Good evening from S Wales!

Sorry maybe a simple question but?

I am having a go at rigging for the first time. I assume the radio antenna rigging was thinner than the general rigging etc?

Thanks bob

Top