Corticene & Semtex

Post a reply

Confirmation code
Enter the code exactly as it appears. All letters are case insensitive.

BBCode is OFF
Smilies are OFF

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Corticene & Semtex

Semtex

by Rodders » Thu Oct 11, 2007 4:19 pm

:cool_2:

Nowadays "Semtex" is a very powerful plastic explosive used primarily by the Military.
Dunno what they are using on RN decks now.
I the 60's I went to sea in Ton class mine sweepers and the external upper and foc'sle decks were teak. The internal decks were covered in cortisone with coconut matting on the actual walkways.
Bloody things would roll on wet grass and you soon got your sea legs. Trouble was you rolled when ashore before you got to a pub. Getting back the beer made you walk straight !!

by Laurence Batchelor » Tue Jun 05, 2007 5:37 am

Yes I've done that before in Navy News I placed an advert it was most useful.

There is also a listing of many of the associations on the Navy News website.

I think I'll let this stick in my mind and when I finally work down to the I-class & Tribals on my research list I will re-examine this question once again.

I think this summer I will start a letter campaign to most of these associations, there largely untapped and as you say always helpful.

2 years ago the Havelock one I was asked to take over, but I just don't have the time until I can knock Uni on its head once and for all.

by Rob » Tue Jun 05, 2007 5:24 am

Laurence - if you were so-minded, a couple of other things you could try:

1. letter to be printed in Warship World - with it's circulation you might reach a member of the crew of one of the ships

2. Contact the veteran's association if there is one. A good friend of mine routinely contacts associations when he is modelling a specific ship. Generally they are very helpful and will take an interest in your work.

Cheers,

Rob

by Laurence Batchelor » Tue Jun 05, 2007 5:00 am

Rob,
It could be that way, this was just something I spotted whilst reading something.

I'm not doing an in depth study on deck coverings, merely noticed this and brought it to the authors attention.

The problem I foresee though Rob is there is unlikely anymore easily obtained evidence out there.
It would probably take going through all the yard records for each I-class & Tribal & also going through photos from 1937-38.

ar,
Did you ever follow up any leads with the makers of these deck coverings?
For example I know Semtex was made by:-
Semtex Ltd.
Oakfield
2 Derby Road, Caversham, Reading
This commercial firm also applied them to the decks of warships for the shipbuilders.

What was Supertex used for onboard ships? and also Aranbee?

by Rob » Tue Jun 05, 2007 3:20 am

Laurence,

FWIW = for what it's worth

Yes, I did read your first post. I am not disputing the facts that you have and I have no doubt that you are better read on the subject than I am.

What I consider is that your analysis jumps too swiftly to a conclusion. At least 33% of the class had "dirty brown decks", so corticene. We also see that some had semtex decks, which leaves others still unaccounted for.

Therefore as a constructive criticism, you have more evidence to accumulate.

Would it be reasonable to suggest that the first class with semtex AS STANDARD would be more likely to be the Tribals?

Cheers,

Rob

by Laurence Batchelor » Mon Jun 04, 2007 11:05 am

Don't worry perhaps its a discussion over a drink or two, or three in November.

Yes Rant and Rave is a free for all, when Werner gets on here he should move it quickly back into here its rightful place.

by ar » Mon Jun 04, 2007 11:01 am

The choice is yours.
On the general arrangement accuracy of Ough's plans; that would need a brief presentation, not a place like this, with things coming out in bits and pieces.

On the Rant and Rave section, I cannot nor would I post there, it seems too much of a free for all.
Laurence Batchelor wrote:Sorry I can't whip out another survivor from HMS Intrepid out of a hat.

This above quote is taken from George Mack's book by William Kimber which is of course edited and checked through by a number of her crew before publishing and this makes it stronger evidentially.

Mack had served on both Royal Sovereign and Renown in the early 1930s undoubtively having had to scrub corticene on both ships.

When drafted to Intrepid, while at Cowes, he would surely be a creditable witness to the transition to semtex as he was now asked to scrub that also! before and after her aceptance trails.

I am not familiar with ever seeing Norman Ough produce I-class plans?
I do agree though he worked a lot of extra detail into his plans which don't appear on the 'as fitteds'.
Its a pity though some of his dimensions were wrong, and Ajax was it or was it a Dido which was highly inaccurate, he was only human after all! :big_grin:

by Laurence Batchelor » Mon Jun 04, 2007 10:52 am

Rob,

I only so far have read this for Intrepid , are there other I-class books out there? I don't know of any others.
In my eyes the I-class were very much a homongeous flotilla and for their first commission they all went off to the Med for 2 and a bit years and served together just before WW2.


They also appear off Malta pre-war exercising on the Naval Time Capsule Video No.4, the colour one, but from memory I don't think there are any good deck shots. They would not be in British docks again until near to wartime.

However, importantly read my 1st post please, it was on other I-class ships in the flotilla, hence the difficulties they all had in cleaning this new chemical deck matting, aka Semtex! and Impulsive finding the key was salt water to keep em clean.

I concede though it does mention 3 'with dirty brown decks' so they might have been 3 of the 9 still with corticene whilst the other 6 had semtex.

P.S. what does FWIW mean please?

by Laurence Batchelor » Mon Jun 04, 2007 10:42 am

Sorry I can't whip out another survivor from HMS Intrepid out of a hat.

This above quote is taken from George Mack's book by William Kimber which is of course edited and checked through by a number of her crew (including her Captain) before publishing and this makes it stronger evidentially.

Mack had served on both Royal Sovereign and Renown in the early 1930s undoubtively having had to scrub corticene on both ships.

When drafted to Intrepid, while at Cowes, he was 20 and had 4 years experience and would surely be a creditable witness to the transition to semtex as he was now asked to scrub that also! before and after her acceptence trails.

I am not familiar with ever seeing Norman Ough produce I-class plans?
I do agree though he worked a lot of extra detail into his plans which don't appear on the 'as fitteds'.
Its a pity though some of his dimensions were wrong, and Ajax was it or was it a Dido which was highly inaccurate, he was only human after all! :big_grin:

by ar » Mon Jun 04, 2007 10:30 am

Ough died in very late 1964 at the age of 64.
From the early nineteen twenties to nearly the end of his life, he made a practice of visiting ships (on board), taking photographs and he also took a note pad, making sketches and detailed measurements of the smallest fittings. This is why his drawings are often so detailed, details that are not on the "as fitteds". They come from first hand observation.
If I had to choose, I would go with Ough. However if you can get an independent confirmation of the crew members statement from a second source, that's different.

Laurence Batchelor wrote:So was he wrong then?
I know he was a senior gentlemen even back in the 1950s.
Was he an adult in the 1930s? Did he go onboard these ships back then?

We all know him as a model maker par excellance, but surely we must believe the actual crew members who scrubbed the actual decks at the actual time?

by Rob » Mon Jun 04, 2007 10:29 am

Laurence - You are citing the example of one member of the I class. Surely concluding therefore that semtex was applied to all members of the class from the outset would be a bit of a sweeping assumption? Have you considered differences between different ships in the same class? Perhaps there is the possibility it appeared on Intrepid as an experiment?

FWIW, I would think you ought to check further.

Cheers,

Rob

by Laurence Batchelor » Mon Jun 04, 2007 9:56 am

So was he wrong then?
I know he was a senior gentlemen even back in the 1950s.
Was he an adult in the 1930s? Did he go onboard these ships back then?

We all know him as a model maker and draftsman par excellence, but surely we must believe the actual crew members who scrubbed the actual decks at the actual time no?

by ar » Mon Jun 04, 2007 9:50 am

From one of many conversations with Norman Ough in the nineteen fifties.
He had an encylopedic knowledge of this type of thing, coming from first hand observation.


Laurence Batchelor wrote:Dear ar

I quote from your article and there's one point I wish to disagree on, if I may:-
"SEMTEX: A trowelled-on non-slip composite material.
Used on destroyers from the Tribal Class (1938) onwards. Used sometimes on small working areas of wartime construction cruisers and battleships and refitted cruisers and battleships. Used on war built escort vessels.
Color: Medium dark green.
CORTICENE: A linoleum, held down by thin brass strips. Used on most new construction from around 1915 onwards, on ships of destroyer size downwards. Last destroyer class to use Corticene was the �I� class of the late thirties. Used on small working areas of large ships up to the late thirties.
Color: Medium brown - described as the colour of milk chocolate."

From a first-hand account from George Mack who was a seaman gunner who joined HMS Intrepid on her 1st commission in July 1937 he states "We had managed to sweep up, but the decks looked filthy as they were covered in a new paste-like surface, instead of the brown corticene, held down with shiny brass strips, as on other ships.....Another snag about 'Semtex' was that it wore through the soles of shoes at an alarming rate, as it was like walking on sandpaper."

So it would appear the I-class destroyers were the first with Semtex to replace Corticene and not the Tribals. Off the top of my haed the I-class mostly commissioned in 1937 whereas the Tribals were in 1938.
What was your source of this (mis)information please? documentation or interviews?

by Laurence Batchelor » Mon Jun 04, 2007 9:41 am

Dear ar

I quote from your article and there's one point I wish to disagree on, if I may:-
"SEMTEX: A trowelled-on non-slip composite material.
Used on destroyers from the Tribal Class (1938) onwards. Used sometimes on small working areas of wartime construction cruisers and battleships and refitted cruisers and battleships. Used on war built escort vessels.
Color: Medium dark green.
CORTICENE: A linoleum, held down by thin brass strips. Used on most new construction from around 1915 onwards, on ships of destroyer size downwards. Last destroyer class to use Corticene was the �I� class of the late thirties. Used on small working areas of large ships up to the late thirties.
Color: Medium brown - described as the colour of milk chocolate."

From a first-hand account from George Mack who was a seaman gunner who joined HMS Intrepid on her 1st commission in July 1937 he states "We had managed to sweep up, but the decks looked filthy as they were covered in a new paste-like surface, instead of the brown corticene, held down with shiny brass strips, as on other ships.....Another snag about 'Semtex' was that it wore through the soles of shoes at an alarming rate, as it was like walking on sandpaper."

So it would appear the I-class destroyers were the first with Semtex to replace Corticene and not the Tribals. Off the top of my head the I-class mostly commissioned in 1937 whereas the Tribals were in 1938.
What was your source of this (mis)information please? documentation or interviews?

by Laurence Batchelor » Sun Jun 03, 2007 7:07 pm

Thats it Steve many thanks :thumbs_up_1:

by Steve Sobieralski » Sun Jun 03, 2007 3:41 pm

Laurence,

Are you thinking of his multi-part series on the development of naval camouflage on S&S's ship camouflage site? There is a brief discussion of deck coverings in Part III.

http://www.shipcamouflage.com/developme ... uflage.htm

Corticene & Semtex

by Laurence Batchelor » Sun Jun 03, 2007 12:43 pm

Reading this today jogged my memory...
As soon as we arrived in Chatham our chums began to arrive aboard to see what the new ship looked like, and to renew old acquaintances.
From the jetty we looked very smart in our gleaming light grey Med Fleet colours, against the dark grey of the Home Fleet ships that were in the yard with us, but when they stepped aboard things were not so smart. We had managed to sweep up, but the decks looked filthy as they were covered in a new paste-like surface, instead of the brown corticene, held down with shiny brass strips, as on other ships.
By Sunday the POs and leading seaman had gone round other ships to borrow a supply of cleaning materials and we set to with a will to clean the upper deck. To our disgust, nothing had the slightest effect, in spite of all the skills that years of hard-won experience lavished on it! When we eventually met the rest of the flotilla we found they had been equally unsuccessful; the only real difference between the ships was that three had dirty brown decks, three dirty blue decks and three had dirty grey decks!

This curse held over us for about six months, until suddenly we noticed that the Impulsive had cleaner decks than the rest of us. In spite of her trying to keep the secret formula to herself, we soon noticed that she was washing her decks with a salt water hose, and the problem was solved. Salt water and nothing else. We now had the problem of a dirty ship's side! In all fairness however this was one of the best things that happened to destroyers. For it meant there was a really safe foothold in all weathers. Before this the decks were very slippery, and to give extra grip at sea, coconut matting was laid round the guns and along the iron deck, but the first seas coming aboard would rip the lashings, and it was a constant battle to keep it securely lashed down. Another snag about 'Semtex' was that it wore through the soles of shoes at an alarming rate, as it was like walking on sandpaper.
has anyone the link to the Alan Raven article of deck coverings used in the RN in WW2 please?
I remember it was posted online somewhere and was taken from one of the modelling magazines some years ago, but I can't seem to find it.
Many thanks :thumbs_up_1:

Top