by Sauragnmon » Sun Jan 10, 2010 5:09 pm
Knox Mod:
Baleares style side-mounting for two Phalanx mounts, just slightly aft of the MACK, which would allow retention of the Mk29. Alternately, build up a deckhouse and put a Mk22 on the aft mount? Not sure of the weight there. As to Harpoons, one could set them amidships, forward of the hangar? Wouldn't fit many I think, but you could put them there.
Perry Mod:
Could remove the Mk13 and replace with a small short-cell VLS to support SM-2 and such but not TLAM. Remove the gun from the top deck, put it down on the weather deck, allowing Harpoons in place of the 3" gun. There's been a few cells placed ahead of the Mk13 in other nations' uses, so there might be enough margin space to mount the 3" on a better positioning.
Guns - twin mounts would be negligible benefit on the Knox especially, as the gun has two loading systems for that single barrel, retaining a good rate of fire - simialrly, the 76mm gun has a rather fast rate when it's running good.
Knox Mod:
Baleares style side-mounting for two Phalanx mounts, just slightly aft of the MACK, which would allow retention of the Mk29. Alternately, build up a deckhouse and put a Mk22 on the aft mount? Not sure of the weight there. As to Harpoons, one could set them amidships, forward of the hangar? Wouldn't fit many I think, but you could put them there.
Perry Mod:
Could remove the Mk13 and replace with a small short-cell VLS to support SM-2 and such but not TLAM. Remove the gun from the top deck, put it down on the weather deck, allowing Harpoons in place of the 3" gun. There's been a few cells placed ahead of the Mk13 in other nations' uses, so there might be enough margin space to mount the 3" on a better positioning.
Guns - twin mounts would be negligible benefit on the Knox especially, as the gun has two loading systems for that single barrel, retaining a good rate of fire - simialrly, the 76mm gun has a rather fast rate when it's running good.