Mickosh3 wrote:
Hello, Gav!
Let me to discuss a little bit around the machinery of your model.
The motor your bought , I think, really is more fit for racing (or even flying!) model. The motor can bring you problems with cooling, prop and shaft adjustments,bearings and so on.... Beside it, the motor can eat your battery in very short time!
Why don't you take a good old 5-7 pole DC motor with 20...30 VA power? It is more then enough for your model. If you add a LI-Po battery (f.e. with 2800 mA/h capacity) you can save lots of weight and money and enjoy with floating no less than a hour.
About the weight: if your model takes 6 kilo without a machinery - be careful with your plans regarding a steam engine - the weight may be critical . I advise you to set your model in water (in bath!) as a primary check of your "weight credit"
About the transmition - yes, your frames don't allow to use the direct drive. Why not a cardan shaft with a side motor position?
It is just my opinion!
With best regards - Anatoly
G'day Anatoly,
You pose some exceedingly good points. So to determine just how much weight I have to play with, floated the tug in the bath.
The following 2 pics are showing the waterline without ballast. She is very unstable, so had to hold her level.
Attachment:
File comment: View amidships showing waterline without ballast
Waterline without ballast.JPG [ 102.36 KiB | Viewed 5458 times ]
Attachment:
File comment: Bow view without ballast
Bow without ballast.JPG [ 78.78 KiB | Viewed 5458 times ]
As can be seen, she is riding well high of the intended waterline. The very hard to see fine black line is the actual waterline as per the plans ( a little painting to be done..)
The following pics are of the waterline with ballast. Very stable in these shots

Attachment:
File comment: View once ballast added
overall view once ballast added.JPG [ 89.74 KiB | Viewed 5458 times ]
Attachment:
File comment: ballasted bow
Ballast in bow view.JPG [ 78.15 KiB | Viewed 5458 times ]
I was actually surprised by how much it took to get her to settle down to this depth... so I weighed the ballast and took a photo of it.
Attachment:
File comment: Shot of brass ballast used on scales 5 July 13
brass ballast used 4795 grams.JPG [ 126.75 KiB | Viewed 5458 times ]
That is right, it takes 4.795 kg of weight. Add that to the current weight of 6kg, for a model only 3 feet long, she is a heavy weight. Will be just shy of 11 kg completed.
With that in mind, it may pay to just make up the steam engine, I have the material, and I know they can run quite slow and I will need the ballast anyway.
I must admit Anatoly, I am really surprised by just how much weight was needed. So would appear that I have another project to do to finish this project....

All good fun. Have a plan of a paddleduck steam engine with an oiler so the compressed air doesn't dry out the "O" rings in the cylinders. It isn't very big, it has reverse, so will be perfect. Still have a few bits to add to the superstructure, but overall, the vessel is pretty much done.
Please feel free to comment.
Regards,
Gav