The Ship Model Forum

The Ship Modelers Source
It is currently Thu Jul 10, 2025 8:27 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2637 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ... 132  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:34 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:02 am
Posts: 10570
Location: EG48
There are some good details but it's not going to cover everything. The photos document the damage so there are no views of undamanged areas. But if you look at them you can piece together a lot of little details.

jmchaica, Devin's got it right. I don't have all of those photos processed yet or even with me right now. It takes long enough to format the reports that I don't want to take any time reposting images.... so the link will be here when the reports are done.

_________________
Tracy White -Researcher@Large

"Let the evidence guide the research. Do not have a preconceived agenda which will only distort the result."
-Barbara Tuchman


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 2:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 2:59 pm
Posts: 43
Location: Lancaster, PA
I had a chance to spend several hours aboard the Yorktown at Patriots Point last week. One of things that still intrigued me was "what did they do with those dividers between door sections" when they opened the doors on the hangar deck.

Well, it appears that they simply slid them off to the side after the doors were raised. Here are two pictues that show the rail mechanism for one of the door units. I think the dividers would have slid to the left on the overhead rail.

Edited by Tracy - I took your image links out as they were causing 530 error messages to pop up and Timmy posted them correctly


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 2:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 6:00 pm
Posts: 12331
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Poppop wrote:
I had a chance to spend several hours aboard the Yorktown at Patriots Point last week. One of things that still intrigued me was "what did they do with those dividers between door sections" when they opened the doors on the hangar deck.

Well, it appears that they simply slid them off to the side after the doors were raised. Here are two pictues that show the rail mechanism for one of the door units. I think the dividers would have slid to the left on the overhead rail.



Image

Image

There ya go.

Tracy: Here's the Hancock section from Trumpy's site: http://www.trumpeter-china.com/war513/p ... asp?id=335

_________________
De quoi s'agit-il?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 16, 2006 12:08 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:02 am
Posts: 10570
Location: EG48
Yeah, looking at those pictures it looks to me like they fold up fore and aft instead of inward.

Just an update for everyone on some projects i"ve got going on. Ron Smith sent me a disc of a bunch of Essex photos I asked him... actually I paid him... to scan in. The nature of the agreement is that I can't publish them without an additional fee so I will not be dropping any here willy-nilly, but it is going to help get the Essex book done. Bonus.

The reports I mentioned earlier are underway; I'm about 3/4 of the way through the shipyard report on Tico, making it about halfway finished overall. Taking a little longer than I'd hoped, so in the interim here's a photo of Hornet to tide y'all over. This is the forward quad 40mm quad with the flight deck crunched down over it. Of note is the canvas covering over the recoil springs on the barrels; these were put in place when the guns weren't in use to protect them from the elements. So for those with less exact paint skills you could paint the barrels all the same color and just say there were canvas coverings over the springs.


Image

_________________
Tracy White -Researcher@Large

"Let the evidence guide the research. Do not have a preconceived agenda which will only distort the result."
-Barbara Tuchman


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 16, 2006 10:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2005 7:29 pm
Posts: 1321
Location: Tempe, Arizona
Hey all, in May-June Ill be able to go out and spend a day or so on the USS Intrepid in New York. I was wondering (tracy) how much the hangar deck is the same as in her WWII configuration? I might get a chance to see the USS New Jersey on that trip as well (I'm spending 2 weeks in Wash. DC and NY with my aunt). I'm hoping to get lots of photos so maybe someday I will be able to super detail a kit if it ever comes out, or scratch build my own.

_________________
-Abram
ModelWarships Gallery Page
Joslin Models Facebook Page


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 16, 2006 10:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 10:46 am
Posts: 2467
Location: Hoboken, NJ
ArizonaBB39 wrote:
Hey all, in May-June Ill be able to go out and spend a day or so on the USS Intrepid in New York. I was wondering (tracy) how much the hangar deck is the same as in her WWII configuration? I might get a chance to see the USS New Jersey on that trip as well (I'm spending 2 weeks in Wash. DC and NY with my aunt). I'm hoping to get lots of photos so maybe someday I will be able to super detail a kit if it ever comes out, or scratch build my own.


I was on Intrepid last summer and from what I can tell it is NOTHING like it was during WWII. They use the ship more for special events than as a museum, so a lot of stuff has been removed. Parts of the hangar deck are carpeted, a big chunk of the forward part has been taken over for offices and a movie theater, etc.

Drop me an email when you're in town and we'll try to do lunch or something; I work about 7 blocks from the Intrepid and live just across the river in Hoboken.

-Devin


Last edited by Devin on Tue Apr 08, 2008 2:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 16, 2006 11:37 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:02 am
Posts: 10570
Location: EG48
One of the things I've determined about these ships is that the hangar bays changed just as much as the outsides did. So your question is hard to answer because I'd have to know when you're talking about ;)

That said, I think I have more hangar shots of Intrepid than any other Essex ship.

_________________
Tracy White -Researcher@Large

"Let the evidence guide the research. Do not have a preconceived agenda which will only distort the result."
-Barbara Tuchman


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 17, 2006 1:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 1:10 am
Posts: 2299
Location: (42.24,-87.81)
Tracy & friends:

Does anybody have good, clear photos of the starboard quarter gun gallery on the SCB-125C ships (14, 16, 19, 31, 38)? A comparison would be especially useful. Underside photos of the support structure are especially welcome.

I've decided to resolve the ambiguity in one of my favorite models.

_________________
If an unfriendly power had attempted to impose on America the mediocre educational performance that exists today, we might well have viewed it as an act of war.

-- "A Nation at Risk" (1983)


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 17, 2006 1:29 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:02 am
Posts: 10570
Location: EG48
Best I can offer at this point are those I sent to Navsource for CVs 16, 19, and 38.

_________________
Tracy White -Researcher@Large

"Let the evidence guide the research. Do not have a preconceived agenda which will only distort the result."
-Barbara Tuchman


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 17, 2006 1:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 1:10 am
Posts: 2299
Location: (42.24,-87.81)
They must have not posted them yet. It's almost as if this position is avoided by photograhers.

Raven & Roberts are not much help, either.

Here's hoping something comes to light in the future. At least one (Lexington) is still extant, although the positions are long empty.

_________________
If an unfriendly power had attempted to impose on America the mediocre educational performance that exists today, we might well have viewed it as an act of war.

-- "A Nation at Risk" (1983)


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 17, 2006 10:49 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:02 am
Posts: 10570
Location: EG48
They've posted what I gave them; I was just saying that I don't have any good photos yet.

There's a chance I may in the future as there's an accession at Seattle NARA they're processing for me that contains CV records from the 1950s. However, this "processing" I mentioned could take another year due to the scope of what they're doing and the manpower available... then I have to get the time to go through it.....it was about 70 xerox paper boxes before they started processing so you might imagine I won't be going through it in a day.

And PS, these records are not all pictures; of the 7-8 boxes I was allowed to flip through before they started processing there were only 3-4 photos total.

_________________
Tracy White -Researcher@Large

"Let the evidence guide the research. Do not have a preconceived agenda which will only distort the result."
-Barbara Tuchman


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 18, 2006 1:41 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:02 am
Posts: 10570
Location: EG48
I just got the 1st Quarter 2006 Warship Modeler magazine and it has excellent coverage of Wally Bigelow's CV-11 Intrepid build in 1/350th scale. This is one of the two best I've seen in terms of accuracy and extra work. In addition to lots of color & B&W photos there's a list of all the work he did in pulling off this ship.

_________________
Tracy White -Researcher@Large

"Let the evidence guide the research. Do not have a preconceived agenda which will only distort the result."
-Barbara Tuchman


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 30, 2006 7:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 1:40 pm
Posts: 369
Location: Marinha Grande - Leiria, Portugal.
Does anybody know the exact number of TBM-3E, which belonged to VT-88, when they were aboard Yorktown, in the Summer of 1945 ???
Thanks...

:cool_1: .


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: A hell of a debut
PostPosted: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:05 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2006 8:13 am
Posts: 29
Location: Naples, italy
Hi all,

first let me briefly introduce myself.
I am Italian, 41, engineer, career in management, married with 2 young children, long time (average and just recently getting better) modeller with a modelling career with long pauses, but also intense sparks of activity.
I always preferred bigger scales if possible (I built the Nichimo Yamato, of course), so I most often build 1:350 kits (and wander why no one wants even bigger kits, but I know I am lonely in this).

Unfortunately my first little girl has serious health problems so I:
- get much needed help in relieving distress/tension by modelling (only ships, even if I also do some aircraft/tanks die-cast collecting, when I can get them at a discount) and studying warship history,
- have to accommodate hobby expenses with the much more necessary financial support for all the medical aid I can afford to provide my little beloved Emanuela (so I can’t afford all the modelling luxuries I would love to get).

Recently I declared war on depression by starting an ambitious carrier building program.
I started out with the Essex class by buying a CV13 kit + CV 16 kit (both Trumpeter 1:350 + GMM excellent P/E frets, both ship frets, no airwing yet to dress up both ladies).
My idea is to capitalise on time spent studying the class by building at least these 2 ships (may be a 1943 Essex to follow later on).

I have to say that I had a little experience with a CV10 kit 1:350 that I hurriedly assembled OOB for a friend’s child when it had just been released.
A lousy build for my standards but enough to make the kid happy and for me to learn some lesson in building this kit.

Second of all I want to deeply thank all of you guys (Tracy first of course) for all I inexpensively learned in these pages.

I hope you will not mind if I will ask a few questions here.
Tracy I can’t wait to see your book out, I’ll accommodate it on my budget no matter what, great research efforts like yours deserve recognition and support – in the meantime I hope I can get enough help to limit inaccuracies in my 2 builds.

My general idea is to build CV13 in 1945 fit/paint scheme to be able to use most AA and to display F4U Corsairs on her deck. I’ll probably do an “in operation” deck with 20/30 planes about to take off.

For CV14 I would like to build her in 1944 dazzle scheme, short deck (with all the cut outs Tracy let us know about in his article), deck full of birds. My ideal would be to replicate the well known S021445 navsource photo.

Ok let me start pose some initial questions:
1) CV14 short deck cut-outs. I know Nautilus has released correctly shaped wood deck for all possible configurations, included this one, but I need to save some money to be able to buy from them CV5 wood deck+conversion set for my next project (CV5 + CV8 diorama either at Midway or Dolittle raid). I hence would like to cut to correct shape the CV14 plastic deck. The 2 small cut outs are trivial (just cut out the non planked area as in the CV13 deck), but the larger one… Can anyone provide some precise diagram about where exactly I have to cut (I just have a clue given by the available photos, and I would like to be as accurate as possible) ?
2) CV 13 stbd side added 40 mm sponsons. I noticed that Keith Haufnagel lowered somewhat the 3 stbd side midship added 40 mm sponsons on his great CV10 build. Is Trumpeter guided position inaccurate also for a 1945 CV13 (unfortunately, I had not noticed and I have already them on) ?
3) the “solid catwalk” (flight deck level) narrow long overhang located just on the stbd side of the island (you know the one that is moulded on the central deck piece just stbd of were the island will be). GMM does not provide a replacement perforated catwalk for it. Knowing how careful Loren Perry is I have to suppose it was just in fact a solid one. Still I wander why the navy would have a heavy solid structure there, instead of the more usual lighter catwalk. Cutting it will make putting7sanding easier and besides Trumpeter plastic rendering of it looks too wide to my eye when compared to the pictures...
4) catwalk wells/archways. Thanks to Tracy that pointed them out I finally noticed on pics that those openings are clearly recognisable and should add much visual impact to models. I may try to chop off the plastic flight deck undersides to render them. There will be some problems at extreme stern/bow since one will have to build the gallery level deck so that the hole does not show light trough. However, no matter how I choose to render them (Tracy is probably wiser in his consideration of just painting them) I would like to get a typical shape diagram plus a location where they (more or less) should be located. From the few photos I saw it looks like there will be at least a couple of dozen of them, many behind AA positions, but also along perforated catwalks).
5) Does anyone have any suggestion on how to substitute hollowed brass barrels (from L’Arsenal) for both closed and open mounts ? I can only think of cutting the plastic barrel at the base, just a little longer than necessary (i.e.with a little slack), then use the small surplus (thinned by light sanding) as a positioning pin to be inserted at the back end of the hollowed metal barrel. I have not bought the barrels yet, so I am not sure this procedure could be made to work. Besides if one messes up a barrel.... may be I should also buy a resin set from them. I would also get some dual turrets with the small cupola on top …

More questions for later posts.

Thanks in advance for the help, guys.

Yours
Luca


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: A hell of a debut
PostPosted: Thu Mar 30, 2006 12:32 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:02 am
Posts: 10570
Location: EG48
Welcome aboard Luca! I took care of your post for you. I hope that your girl's health issues aren't permanent!

Luca Bevilacqua wrote:
1) CV14 short deck cut-outs. I know Nautilus has released correctly shaped wood deck for all possible configurations, included this one, but I


This is an issue I've known about but haven't got to yet. James @ Nautilus has looked at the deck closer than I and told me that the deck itself and structure below it are subtly wrong in shape, so one can't just go off of plans and make cuts as they won't work quite right. If you can wait a month or so, I've been meaning to pick up some plans for Hancock and work on a diagram for the cut-out that "looks right"

Luca Bevilacqua wrote:
2) CV 13 stbd side added 40 mm sponsons. I noticed that Keith Haufnagel lowered somewhat the 3 stbd side midship added 40 mm sponsons on his great CV10 build. Is Trumpeter guided position inaccurate also for a 1945 CV13 (unfortunately, I had not noticed and I have already them on) ?


I'll have to look into this as I hadn't noticed that

Luca Bevilacqua wrote:
3) the “solid catwalk” (flight deck level) narrow long overhang located just on the stbd side of the island (you


I've got a shot of Bunker Hill that shows this area well and I believe it to be the perforated catwalk but I'll have to double check tonight.

Luca Bevilacqua wrote:
4) catwalk wells/archways. Thanks to Tracy that pointed them out I finally noticed on pics that those openings are


This is another area that I know is wrong but I haven't spent the time to diagram what's right. What you might do is try and locate a copy of Glenn Arnold's Essex class book; it comes with plans of Essex that show the gallery level from the side and should be a big help. It's one thing I'm hoping to put in the book, but at this point I can't give you a date becuase it makes sense for me to wait until Trumpeter has released the 1/350th Hancock and 1/700th long hulls so I can include them as well.

Luca Bevilacqua wrote:
5) Does anyone have any suggestion on how to substitute hollowed brass barrels (from L’Arsenal) for both closed and open mounts ?


That quote might be better suited for the tips and tricks section as that's more general and people who don't build essex ships (and therefore wouldn't see this thread) might still have excellent ideas.

_________________
Tracy White -Researcher@Large

"Let the evidence guide the research. Do not have a preconceived agenda which will only distort the result."
-Barbara Tuchman


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: A hell of a debut
PostPosted: Fri Mar 31, 2006 12:18 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:02 am
Posts: 10570
Location: EG48
Luca Bevilacqua wrote:
3) the “solid catwalk” (flight deck level) narrow long overhang located just on the stbd side of the island (you know the one that is moulded on the central deck piece just stbd of were the island will be).


OK, verified that this catwalk was NOT solid.

_________________
Tracy White -Researcher@Large

"Let the evidence guide the research. Do not have a preconceived agenda which will only distort the result."
-Barbara Tuchman


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 31, 2006 6:06 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2006 8:13 am
Posts: 29
Location: Naples, italy
Hi Tracy,

thanks a lot for the warm welcome, and the much needed help.

I really appreciate it all :rolf_3: .

About my little Emanuela, she has a serious handicap (for one: she is 4 and does not speak a word), something went wrong with her brain structure (myelin sheat in particular).
So far doctors have not been able to come up with a precise diagnosis yet (problems in pregnancy vs. rare recessive genetic defect).
One thing is sure: she can only be treated by "training" in specialised reabilitation centers (and much love).
No drugs for it.
So I do not know if and what extent she will have a near-normal life. Unfortunately I do not even know what her life expectancy is.
Really hard for a father.

So ship modelling (that I always loved since I was a child) is something that really helps me dealing with it all.
Much more so my second born little boy Martin (1 year old).

Enough for sad topics.

Thanks a lot for the answers (and for all what I learned reading your excellent reviews/research/posts).
I'll try to refrain from cutting the CV14 deck just yet and wait for your help.
The mentioned plastic catwalk will go and be substituted by spare P/E catwalk from a Tom Essex P/E Essex fret that my dog partially ruined.
I suspect the real thing was narrower than the P/E Tom provides for others catwalks tough...
I'll try to refrain from punching outthe archways jusy yet, also (while I look for the book you mentioned, or for your book to hit the shelves).
Knowing the precise locations, taking care of puncing out the archways should not be a major problem do not you think ?

Please let me abuse of youk kindness and knowledge by posing a few more questions:

1) gun tub inside colour: I remember reading that on BBs the 40 mm quad tub had always inside walls painted deck blue, like the flooring, would this be the case also for carriers ? I noticed that most good modellers paint the inside walls diffrently (gray).
2) directors on catwalks: from your great posts here I learned that Trumpeter misplaced directors for some added 40 mm, placing them down on sponson or deck level, where they were obviously placed up on the catwalks for obvious reasons of better line of sight. If I got it correctly they should be the 2 Trumepter placed aft at hangar deck level (stbd), and the ones on the port side fore (ex hangar) sponson. Problem is if one positions them on teh catwalks, the catwalk itself gets interrupted. what did people on real ships do ? Get inside the gallery deck from nearby wells and then out again once passed the obstacle ? The book you mentioned (or better yours) should tak ecare of exact placement.


Ciao and thanks again

yours

Luca


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 31, 2006 11:55 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:02 am
Posts: 10570
Location: EG48
Luca Bevilacqua wrote:
About my little Emanuela, she has a serious handicap


Not to go too far off topic (I'll clean this up in a couple of months) but my youngest brother is mentally retarded and has cerebral palsy. He's a graduate of this school. Feel free to PM me any time you need to talk.

Luca Bevilacqua wrote:
I'll try to refrain from punching outthe archways jusy yet, also (while I look for the book you mentioned, or for your book to hit the shelves). Knowing the precise locations, taking care of puncing out the archways should not be a major problem do not you think ?


First off, the book's not due for a bit. So I'll help people out in the meantime because it doesn't feel right to sit on what I know, but on the other hand, I don't want to release it before all of the models we're going to see have been released.

On to the archways. The catwalk areas in general are simplified on all of the kits, dragon and Trumpter. There's the flight deck, the bulkhead below connecting to the catwalk, said catwalk, then nothing. In some areas this is correct but in many it is not. The below photo illustrates this, it's of CV-16 Lexington in 1944:

Image

Note that the bulkhead on the left extends down below the catwalk. None of the ships plans I have offer any sort of template for this area and it's something I hope to provide so that the builder can just whack the whole thing off and glue in a replacement.

Also note that the director tub in the photo sticks OUT from the catwalk a bit; this is in response to another question you asked below.

Luca Bevilacqua wrote:
1) gun tub inside colour: I remember reading that on BBs the 40 mm quad tub had always inside walls painted deck blue, like the flooring, would this be the case also for carriers ? I noticed that most good modellers paint the inside walls diffrently (gray).


Well... if you REALLY want to do it right they'll probably be black or the hull color. The reason is, at some point early in the ships' service (I forget the exact time frame but I think I have some documents that talk about it scanned in) they started using flash/fire guards over the ammo; this was treated fabric that would hang over the ammo racks when the ship wasn't at battle stations or maybe even during it if that section wasn't going to be used. I haven't seen any official doctrine on it, just the documents I mentioned above and photos.

You can see them in photos such as this one of CV-9 Essex and photo 80-G-299871 on this page. WHen they wanted to access the ammo they simply flipped the fabric over the top of the tub and let it hang on the outside. I haven't managed to find any good shots of this online though... check your books.

You don't see them all the time, such in this photo of CV-12 Hornet, but seeing as one of the drive/train operators isn't even in his seat and there's no armor around the guns I tend to think this photo isn't a really good shot to use as reference.

A quick aside on photo 80-G-299871, this highlights another area *ALL* of the kits get wrong; the supplementary quad 40s added port side aft of the deck-edge elevator were not ON the catwalks and the catwalks did not extend over them; the catwalks were cut and short ladders provided down into the tubs.

Luca Bevilacqua wrote:
2) Problem is if one positions them on teh catwalks, the catwalk itself gets interrupted. what did people on real ships do ?


They were on the catwalks, but they weren't "on" the catwalks; they stuck out from them. You can see that in the above picture and 80-G-299871 that I mentioned on the CV-16 page and this one if you look farther towards the stern. There was some supporting structure below them to carry the weight.

_________________
Tracy White -Researcher@Large

"Let the evidence guide the research. Do not have a preconceived agenda which will only distort the result."
-Barbara Tuchman


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 03, 2006 8:45 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2006 8:13 am
Posts: 29
Location: Naples, italy
Hi Tracy, hi all guys,

first of all Tracy, I am honored that you felt like letting me know about such a private matter as your brother's problems.
I know how difficult it is to mention such sad and higly personal topics.
Believe me I really, really appreciate your support and friendship.
I sencerely hope he will do well in the future, and if I can be of any help (like acting like a guide if both of you feel like taking a vacation trip in Italy,...well Naples :welcome: ), just let me know.
Emanuela gets a fair amount of treatment not far from home, it is the only location I can practically reconcile with the rest of my life (I have a job to keep to feed her and her brother, and wife of course) but in a case such as hers a father never feels like he is doing enough.

OK let's get back to our hobby.
I mentioned my friend's child, whom I donated the CV10 OOB build. Since he is a nice, clever little fellow, I had actually made my gift a little more "historic" by adding the Warship perspective book too.

Once you mentioned it, it was a matter of minutes for me to realise that you were talking about the book I had given him as a gift.
Of course after a short phone call, I now have it back with me to keep for as long as I want.
The 2 sketches (pages 28, 29) you mentioned seem accurate enough to allow me doing at least some drilling and cutting of the archways for both my 2 ladies.
Actually the sketches make clear (you mentioned it but my non native english prevented me from getting it all correctly) that some openings were accessed to by first stepping down 3 steps along the catwalk.
Those openings are in fact archways (they are arc shaped at the top).
The same sketches also illustrate the position of many, squared, larger openings, that do not have a "well" in front (i.e. are just above the "normal" catwalk level).
I suppose those were openings trough which ammunition and other stuff were handled, I am not sure if people could get trough as well, in case of need.
Modelling the two levels in P/E I am afraid is beyond my skills.
I'll probably limit myself to emulate by drilling/filing the two types of openings in correct dimensions all along the gallery, and then add the GMM P/E catwalks as they are.

I also made up my mind about buying the wood decks from Nautilus (certainly for CV14, may be for both).
The wrong catapult length for CV14, the difficulty in cutting the CV14 deck to accurate shape, and the added bonus of having the etched arrestor/wires, made me finally give up on my money savings worries.

Can I ask all of you guys some practical advice on how to mount them ?
I tought of accepting the suggestion given here to keep the plastic piece, as a base.
It will make the whole thing a lot more rigid, and it will make it also much easier to glue the various sponsons, catwalks, undersides to the whole thing.

I'll epoxy the wood deck in place after sanding the plastic deck absolutely flat.
By so doing I will also thin down the plastic deck so that the added wood thickness should result in an assebly that is not too far from correct in scale measures (did anyone check this ?).

Since I never used wood, I have some concerns, tough:
1) round downs at stern/bow (probably to be addressed by epoxy putting and sanding just there),
2) need to seal the wood before painting,
3) best procedure to stain the deck (i.e. should I use colourcoats deck blue ? should I just airbrush it ? or should I brush paint it ? what about some washes later or before,..)
4) the CV14 early shot I would like to emulate shows her in what appears to me as a fairly light deck stain, may be she was still wearing the lighter early stain ?

I checked the position of the added 3 stbd side sponsons amidship.
I think Keith got it right, if you look at pictures of ships wearing measure 12 (for one pag 29 on the above mentioned book, CV16) it can be seen that the lowest part of the sponson is dark, hence their lowest edge was somewhat below the hangar deck level.
Following the Trumpeter guide would result in those parts to be just above the said level.
So I unglued the sponsons I had mounted on my CV13 (..by adding some plastic glue, it took some stomach) puttyied/sanded smooth the resulting surface damage, and filed down the openings sponsons are supposed to go in about 2 mm (1/12 of an inch).
Tonight I'll add new sponsons (the ones I won't need from the CV14 box). They should result to be in the correct place.
The catwalk running just on top of them should now be just below the door/passages moulded on the Trumpeter parts.

Thanks for the gallery/directors info, I should have realised the correct position myself (I would had I had the book with me already...).
I am afraid it won't bee that easy to just glue them on the P/E galleries.
One needs to cut the railings in those places (easy), and somehow support the added wheight from beneath (not easy).
The ideal would be to get the occasion to add all the complex shapes below, as in the great shot you posted.
If I can dare to give a suggestion to you I would love if you could cast them as an add on to Trumpeter parts, rather than a full part replacement.
In this way all the people that (like me) have already assembled the box bulkheads without noticing (or that are too impatient to wait..) could just snap the improvement part on top of the OOB part, when it gets available.

I have some questions about the areas below the flight deck at the bow.
Below the 20 mm. galleries there appears to be another area were Trumpeter cut short of complexities, and where an add on resin part could be of great help.
I also wander if the gallery deck extended between the 3 heavy deck transverse supports that are at the bow.
At extreme bow (further forward than the forward most deck support), I think there should be no gallery level deck below the flight deck, just the P/E catwals should do.
But I am not so sure for the areas between the foremost support and the one aft of it, as well as between the said second support and the third (from the bow).
It should not be too complex to add pieces of flat styrene sheet, level with the below edge of the beams (I hope I am getting all this not too wrong in english), if that was the case, but I cannot make it out clearly just by looking at pics.

Last I would share with you all the procedure that I used to deal with the side elevators supports.
The 2 plastic Trumpeter parts are cast in one main piece per side, that have all the horizontal beams, cast within a flat area.
Once you mount them OOB that area will be unacceptably wrong because in real ships those beams joined the hull flush and not a raised area as Trumpeter chose to render it.

To put a remedy at that error, I considered just cutting the unneeded areas before mounting the thing.
I was afraid, tough, of over-weakening the parts.
besides locating pins are in the back of the unneeded flat areas.

What I wound up doing was to mount the parts OOB, than grab a flat rectangular blade (and lots of patience) and scribe away the un-needed raised areas.
With some care I got a decent result (just a few scribes here & there when I lost control of the blade).
Tonight a little gel type CA to reinforce the bars (where they meet the hull) and a little putty+acetone (I wish I could buy Mr. Surfacer easily in Italy) to clean up the surface and it should look OK (or at least better than OOB).

Got to get back to work, now.

Tracy, I really hope you can come up with some resin improvement part soon, may be before your book will be out.

I had not realised before looking hard at pictures how many improvements the Trumpeter kit needs.

Yours

A warm ciao from Naples

Luca


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 03, 2006 10:20 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2006 8:13 am
Posts: 29
Location: Naples, italy
Hi all guys,

I forgot to say that I have already read the general advice/experience Tracy had with the Nautilus wood deck for the Lexington article featured in this site.
I am afraid sealing is needed, but what product to use ?
Problem is made harder by the fact that in Italy is tough to locate many products that are easily found in the US (Future floor wax, Mr. Surfacer, Crystal Clear glazing fluid, Testors paints, Gunze Sanyo acrilics, and the list goes on and on).

However I went on checking the wood decks also for CV13 and so learned that, for a 1945 CV13, the Trumpeter decks are also wrong (planked over cut outs for port 40 mm, both fore and aft).

Besides this means that one should use the Tico part forward (I have one saved from the happily Tico), and lower the aft 40 mm sponson to gallery level, since those mounts were lowered (at least so says Nautilus).

I wish I add the much needed upcoming book by Tracy, before starting to glue pieces, trusting Trumpeter :lol_pound:.

Well I'll manage it after all, if Nautilus info is correct.

Ciao
Luca


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2637 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ... 132  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group