The Ship Model Forum

The Ship Modelers Source
It is currently Wed Jun 18, 2025 6:13 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 269 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 14  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Feb 12, 2010 2:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 8:34 am
Posts: 124
Location: Perth Western Australia
The both types of Torpedo control stations, Closed and Open are inculued as part of the Tamiya 1/350 generic weapon set in both Milkima and Mogami

Graham


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Feb 13, 2010 2:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 1:21 pm
Posts: 3383
Location: equidistant to everywhere
Did the Mogamis acquire wind baffles around their bridge windows during their 1940 refit?

_________________
Assessing the impact of new area rug under modeling table.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Feb 13, 2010 11:59 am 
Online

Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 10:56 am
Posts: 8814
Location: New York City
I don;t believe so, not until the same 1942-43 timeframe, IIRC from L & W.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Feb 14, 2010 4:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 1:21 pm
Posts: 3383
Location: equidistant to everywhere
Dan, do you know of any close up photos of the Mikuma showing what type of hull plate strake joint she had just prior to her 1940-1941 refit? Overlapping for flush butt jointed? The reason I ask is because I suspect the Mogami class had welded flush butt joints when first completed. During subsequent refit parts of the hull was said to have been riveted to correct problem with welding. I've seen no diagram showing exactly which part of the hull was modified, and exact what was involved in the change over from welding to riveting.

_________________
Assessing the impact of new area rug under modeling table.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Feb 16, 2010 11:14 am 
Online

Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 10:56 am
Posts: 8814
Location: New York City
I'll look thru my references; not sure if there's the sort of closeup pic that can answer that question.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 6:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 1:21 pm
Posts: 3383
Location: equidistant to everywhere
Question answered. I located close up photos of Mogami and Suzuya under construction. Both ships had overlapping joints even when on the stock.

_________________
Assessing the impact of new area rug under modeling table.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Feb 25, 2010 1:01 pm 
Online

Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 10:56 am
Posts: 8814
Location: New York City
After reading thru the text of L&W, and looking closely at pictures of both Suzuya and Kumano bows under construction, I think it may be a combination of both. Bows were of welded construction, and of modular build. They were connected to succeeding hull section by a vertical band of riveted, overlapping joints. But then, the hull appear to resume further aft with abutting joint. FWIW.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Apr 16, 2010 4:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 2:23 am
Posts: 832
Location: Queen City of the South - Cebu City, Philippines
Hi!
:wave_1:

I have a question. What were the colors of the aircraft aboard Mogami at Midway? I have Tamiya's 1942 version of the Mogami but I'm not sure if it depicts the kit at Midway.

Thanks!
Nick
:big_grin:

_________________
Nichol Caballero
Civil Engineer and Ship Enthusiast


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Aug 31, 2010 8:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2007 4:07 am
Posts: 51
Location: Tainan City, Taiwan
Just curious..with the release of the 8" cruiser version of 1/350 "Mogami", what differences would I need to make an 8" gunned version of Suzuya or Kumano from this same era? Were there any? I'd like to make one of these two from that kit as I already have the "Mogami" as an aircraft cruiser and the "Mikuma" in light cruiser rig..

Regards!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Aug 31, 2010 10:46 am 
Online

Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 10:56 am
Posts: 8814
Location: New York City
Well, there are some differences in the hull cross section, and venting around the bridge. There are some small differences in the lower bridge as well.

The HA deck in Mogami/Mikuma (that's the first deck above the main deck, where the TT mounts are located) juts out to either side over the hull/main deck; enough to form a knuckle of sorts at the horizontal juncture. The HA deck width in Suzuya/Kumano was reduced so as to be almost flush. So, you'd have a bit of sanding ahead of you, assuming the kit hull sides were thick enough to take it.

Attached (from a Maru Special), shows the venting, and lack thereof, between the two groups. Also, the bridge layouts from L & W


Attachments:
Mogami class detail differences sketch.jpg
Mogami class detail differences sketch.jpg [ 112.52 KiB | Viewed 3004 times ]
Mogami class bridge plans, small.jpg
Mogami class bridge plans, small.jpg [ 144.17 KiB | Viewed 3004 times ]
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 9:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2007 4:07 am
Posts: 51
Location: Tainan City, Taiwan
Wow! Thanks for that Dan! I guess I'll wait for Tamiya to make their own Suzuya and Kumano as the modifications would likely mean a new kit by them with sprue covering the changes to the bridge and other details.

{Also thanks for your input on the Kirishima thread a few weeks ago. Meant to thank you about the IJN navigation-positioning light arrays that face the stern on that ship.}

Cheers!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 11:00 am 
Online

Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 10:56 am
Posts: 8814
Location: New York City
You are most welcome, Morton :wave_1:


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Jan 29, 2011 9:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2010 6:47 pm
Posts: 3134
Location: Oslo, Norway
Morton_In_Formosa wrote:
Wow! Thanks for that Dan! I guess I'll wait for Tamiya to make their own Suzuya and Kumano as the modifications would likely mean a new kit by them with sprue covering the changes to the bridge and other details.

{Also thanks for your input on the Kirishima thread a few weeks ago. Meant to thank you about the IJN navigation-positioning light arrays that face the stern on that ship.}

Cheers!

Something is telling me that we are going to see a 1944 version of Suzuya/Kumano at Nuremberg toy fair 2011, from Tamiya in 1/350:)


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Jan 29, 2011 12:38 pm 
Online

Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 10:56 am
Posts: 8814
Location: New York City
I would like to see that.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Jan 29, 2011 1:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2010 6:47 pm
Posts: 3134
Location: Oslo, Norway
Well Tamiya knows that an average skill modeler that desires an accurate Suzuya/Kumano is hard to make it from a 1/350 Mogami 1942 version or from 1/350 Mikuma.At the moment in Japan there a lot of garage resin home companies that produces conversion kits for a Suzuya and Kumano based on Tamiya's Mogami 1942 version and Mikuma (Noshiro and Sakawa too for the Hasegawa's Light Cruisers and Chikuma for Tamiya's Tone).


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Feb 19, 2011 9:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 1:40 pm
Posts: 8339
Location: New Jersey
When Mogami was rebuilt after Midway, was the aircraft handling deck the same color as the rest of the ship?

_________________
Martin

"Tomorrow is the most important thing in life. Comes into us at midnight very clean. It's perfect when it arrives and it puts itself in our hands. It hopes we've learned something from yesterday." John Wayne

Ship Model Gallery


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Feb 20, 2011 12:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2010 6:47 pm
Posts: 3134
Location: Oslo, Norway
MartinJQuinn wrote:
When Mogami was rebuilt after Midway, was the aircraft handling deck the same color as the rest of the ship?

The aircraft handling deck was painted IJN Sasebo Gray, the kind of gray the rest of IJN Mogami was painted.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Feb 21, 2011 3:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 1:40 pm
Posts: 8339
Location: New Jersey
Thanks Atma - appreciate it.

_________________
Martin

"Tomorrow is the most important thing in life. Comes into us at midnight very clean. It's perfect when it arrives and it puts itself in our hands. It hopes we've learned something from yesterday." John Wayne

Ship Model Gallery


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Feb 23, 2011 8:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 9:05 am
Posts: 85
Location: New York City
Atma wrote:
At the moment in Japan there a lot of garage resin home companies that produces conversion kits for a Suzuya and Kumano based on Tamiya's Mogami 1942 version and Mikuma (Noshiro and Sakawa too for the Hasegawa's Light Cruisers and Chikuma for Tamiya's Tone).


Hi Can you tell me what companies are producing the Conversion kits for Chikuma? My research did not show many differences between the two ships.

:thanks: Larry


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Feb 23, 2011 5:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2010 6:47 pm
Posts: 3134
Location: Oslo, Norway
I can tell you the manufacture name, but unfortunately I cant find anything about a site of how to contact them. I think is strickly mail order.
Anyway here it is:
Tohoku Blue
21-47-1 Kitayama, Aoba-ku, Sendai City, Japan.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 269 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 14  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests


You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group