The Ship Model Forum

The Ship Modelers Source
It is currently Thu Jun 19, 2025 5:47 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 444 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 23  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Jun 15, 2010 3:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 5:15 am
Posts: 641
Location: England
I hope they do re-release it soon - I found one on ebay but its going to cost around £35 (about $55-60 ish) - which is twice what it would cost to get the 1933 version - might dig my Jintsu out and compare to the drawings and pics people have posted on here.

thanks
Mike


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Jun 15, 2010 3:35 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 10:56 am
Posts: 8814
Location: New York City
I have the Aoshima Jintsu 1942 kit, unbuilt. While I have not gone over it with a fine tooth comb, it certainly appears correct.

Naka has an reference advantage given the 1942 photos that are available but, they can also serve for most details for Jintsu, IMHO.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Jun 17, 2010 12:18 am 
Image


Top
  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Jun 17, 2010 4:32 am 
Image


Top
  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Jun 17, 2010 3:07 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 10:56 am
Posts: 8814
Location: New York City
Hmm, no images


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Jun 17, 2010 5:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 5:15 am
Posts: 641
Location: England
So it's not just me then Dan! Thought it might be my really slow work computer but its the same on my much newer home comp! lol


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Jun 19, 2010 8:06 am 
Image


Top
  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Jun 19, 2010 8:11 am 
IJN KITAKAMI

Image

Image

Image


Top
  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 8:16 pm 
Image

Image

Image

Image


Top
  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jan 26, 2011 12:20 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 12:05 pm
Posts: 24
Hi! I´m looking for linedrawings to detail Jintsu 1942 from Fujimi. Even when Aoshima new kit is accurate, this is the first waterline model I buyed (not the first to build) and I think is not that bad. I need detail specially on the crane, since I see a square one in some sources and others looks similar to the Naka. Any info will help. Thank you guys.

Martin


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Jan 27, 2011 12:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2006 6:50 am
Posts: 352
Location: roma, italia
in model art waterline special #29 (2008 autumn) it is a very detailed history on 5500 t ijn cruisers and it is a article on how to detail the model of jintsu in 1:700 with foto. i have this issue, if you want a scan send a pm.
is is also a history of the class sendai with foto and sketch in scale 1:700
ciao peppe


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Jan 27, 2011 8:56 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 10:56 am
Posts: 8814
Location: New York City
Per Lacroix and Wells, during the 1933-34 refits, Sendai gained a pole derrick, Jintsu and Naka gained a built up (girder) type derrick. Carried thru to her loss.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Jan 27, 2011 9:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2010 6:47 pm
Posts: 3134
Location: Oslo, Norway
Able, in your photos is that a 4 turret Improved Agano class ? Can we have more pictures of it please ?Actually we need more photos of your Oyodo, Yubari and Furutaka/Kako, they look amazing:) Good job !


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jan 28, 2011 8:33 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 10:56 am
Posts: 8814
Location: New York City
Yeah, those what-ifs are very nice. You should post in the gallery


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Feb 10, 2011 1:55 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 2:13 pm
Posts: 185
I have a question for all the experts out there. I have the Aoshima 1/350 scale Nagara kit and I was wondering if the Tom's Modelworks IJN Light & Heavy Cruiser details set http://www.tomsmodelworks.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=23_27&products_id=439 has the correct catapult and crane for this ship.

Also any recommendations on references to help build and detail this model?

Thanks,
Felix Bustelo


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Feb 10, 2011 2:15 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 10:56 am
Posts: 8814
Location: New York City
I have the kit in the box, but only the Aoshima PE fret that is designed for it. The kit looks like a straight forward build. The Tom's fret looks like an enlargement of the 1/700 version; not bad.

I think the Model Art Special #28 or 29 (see prior page) is a pretty good reference for the CLs.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Feb 10, 2011 2:20 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 10:56 am
Posts: 8814
Location: New York City
There aren't any good photos of her in wartime. This 1937 shot is close to her 1942 fit, save for changes to her foremast and searchlights, IIRC.


Attachments:
Nagara at Shanghai, 9- 1937, colorized crop.jpg
Nagara at Shanghai, 9- 1937, colorized crop.jpg [ 148.16 KiB | Viewed 2727 times ]
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Feb 10, 2011 2:21 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 2:13 pm
Posts: 185
Hi Dan,

If I cannot get a hold of that Aoshima fret I was hoping the Tom's would be plan B - so it has the correct catapult and crane for Nagara?

Thanks,
Felix


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Feb 10, 2011 2:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 1:57 pm
Posts: 1298
Location: Schodack Landing, NY
Felix B. wrote:
Hi Dan,

If I cannot get a hold of that Aoshima fret I was hoping the Tom's would be plan B - so it has the correct catapult and crane for Nagara?

Thanks,
Felix


~ $20 US + $5 shipping from Hobby Link Japan. On backorder there, according to website, but I've been getting very quick service on backorders from them recently, far shorter than the 4-6 weeks posted.

http://www.hlj.com/product/AOS04361


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Feb 10, 2011 3:19 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 10:56 am
Posts: 8814
Location: New York City
I think it's correct, Felix. Certainly, the crane boom is a gantry type latticework, and the catapult a Kure type 5 so, it should be good.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 444 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 23  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests


You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group