greenglade wrote:
…Yes, I have read the association words of warning, I fail to see why they would do so for this particular book?…
…Like all such books, you take the info at face value and pick out the bits which you know are correct and leave those which aren't, but hey, how many publications out there are up to date which the current views on Hood, I suspect none…
The problem is that not everyone does detailed research. Some folks don’t want to (they want a “one and done” or “one stop shop” approach). Some of these folks may see this inexpensive and nice-looking book and assume it was the end all piece of research - it ‘looks good’ so it ‘must be correct.’ What a mistake they’d be making in this case. That’s why we don’t really recommend it to the layman (our warning is actually intended for folks who aren’t overly familiar with the ship’s details).
Of course, even if they do additional research, who will they choose to believe? Case in point: Trumpeter. When developing their 1/200 kit, they chose to follow the Kagero book rather than accept the latest correct information that we offered freely to them. In doing so, they actually went backwards in terms of accuracy (their 1/700 kit was more accurate in many ways).
Of course, the above is not true for everyone. True Hood enthusiasts know the deal and should know where to go. Likewise for detail-oriented folks. They can balance multiple sources, etc. Of course, we’ve had doubters among that lot as well. Again, frustrating.
I have to say that the book is very nicely presented despite its errors. It has potential. It could be most excellent if the author ever wishes to issue a corrected version (we’ve offered to help). After all, some of the errors are not his fault: In his defence, I believe he may have based the main designs on some earlier Eastern European plans…Plans which were drawn up at a time when certain photos and discoveries had not yet been uncovered. They also do not appear to have consulted the official plans at that time (or else they wouldn’t have cocked up the size of the second funnel the way they did) .
Additionally, some of the details that we now know to be different than previously assumed, were only found after the book was published. So, he cannot be faulted for these things: i.e., lower bridge extensions, boat deck UP shield shapes, corticene usage, grey antifouling, etc.
Other errors, unfortunately, were well known and resolved before the book went to press, and a little bit of online research, could have been beneficial: i.e., configuration of areas outside the compass platform, admirals bridge, AD platforms, the MFDF structure, the second funnel (that’s a “doozy!”), the amidships searchlight platform/MBW, the ACP, various boat deck bulwarks, etc.).
That’s why we don’t recommend the book. Folks can choose to believe us or not…obviously not everyone will. If folks DO buy it, we recommend they consult EJ’s website, our website, this forum and as many other books as possible! Please don’t rely too strongly upon the Kagero book.
Fortunately, in the case of the 1/200 kit, the Pontos set exists! The folks who use that will be able to correct the vast majority of errors present in the kit.