The Ship Model Forum http://shipmodels.info/mws_forum/ |
|
USS Luce DD-522 Fletcher Class 1/144 http://shipmodels.info/mws_forum/viewtopic.php?f=59&t=158761 |
Page 1 of 2 |
Author: | ModelMonkey [ Sat Jan 31, 2015 8:52 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: USS Luce DD-522 Fletcher Class 1/144 |
Just this link to one photo at DestroyerHistory.org. Year uncertain, possibly before 1945 since she does not have the late-war AA fit (if she was refit). Looking forward to your build! |
Author: | LoB [ Sat Jan 31, 2015 11:19 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: USS Luce DD-522 Fletcher Class 1/144 |
WooHoo!! ~Homer Simpson style . . ~ The mail just arrived with all my Nautilus Models goodies, PE, resin whaleboats, 5" turrets and Square Bridge conversion . . first glance looks OK, I will post a review here. BTW, can someone point me towards a good tutorial for working with PE?? Thanks. |
Author: | thomastmcc [ Sat Jan 31, 2015 12:02 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: USS Luce DD-522 Fletcher Class 1/144 |
best thing sharp knife and a cutting matt .. otherwise a google search comes up with some .. thomas where did you get the 1/72 nautilus models from any link ? |
Author: | LoB [ Sat Jan 31, 2015 12:36 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: USS Luce DD-522 Fletcher Class 1/144 |
thomastmcc wrote: best thing sharp knife and a cutting matt .. otherwise a google search comes up with some .. thomas where did you get the 1/72 nautilus models from any link ? Thanks Thomas. I will check out the Google Search for working with PE. The 1/72 Scale Fletcher will be a Scratch Build . . either using the 1/72 fiberglass hull from Hartman Model Boats: http://www.hartmanmodelboats.com/ . . . or I will scratch build the hull also . . |
Author: | thomastmcc [ Sat Jan 31, 2015 12:48 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: USS Luce DD-522 Fletcher Class 1/144 |
LoB wrote: thomastmcc wrote: best thing sharp knife and a cutting matt .. otherwise a google search comes up with some .. thomas where did you get the 1/72 nautilus models from any link ? Thanks Thomas. I will check out the Google Search for working with PE. The 1/72 Scale Fletcher will be a Scratch Build . . either using the 1/72 fiberglass hull from Hartman Model Boats: http://www.hartmanmodelboats.com/ . . . or I will scratch build the hull also . . hi mate wheres they`re fletcher hull on the site ?.. thomas |
Author: | LoB [ Sat Jan 31, 2015 4:38 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: USS Luce DD-522 Fletcher Class 1/144 |
Thomas, I emailed them asking about a large scale (1/48-1/72) scale Fletcher Hull. Don responded the same day that they just acquired the mold for a 1/72 hull and possibly deck also. Production would be starting up soon. Send them an email . . . |
Author: | thomastmcc [ Mon Feb 02, 2015 4:38 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: USS Luce DD-522 Fletcher Class 1/144 |
looking good doug.. did email them no reply... |
Author: | Guest [ Fri Apr 24, 2015 5:23 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: USS Luce DD-522 Fletcher Class 1/144 |
Tap . .Tap . . Tap . . is this thing on? Anyone there? |
Author: | Rick E Davis [ Sat Dec 19, 2015 12:49 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: USS Luce DD-522 Fletcher Class 1/144 |
You miss understood my comment that I could have been made clearer on my part. When I said identifying an unidentified destroyer in a photo (I find many of these in the 80-G collection at NARA) is easy when the ship's boat has the destroyer's hull number painted on, I mean it in general, not in this case. In this case, the ship's boat isn't in view. I (we in this case) had to work from what can be see in the way of configuration items (as labeled on the marked up image) and the War Diary/Deck logs for USS YORKTOWN (CV-10). For this destroyer we had an issue ... NONE of the destroyers assigned to the TF that escorted USS YORKTOWN on 27 February 1945 fit the configuration. I ended up doing a "Brute Force" search of FLETCHER class images in my collection and narrowed it down to USS KIMBERLY or USS LUCE, sister-ships built at Bethlehem-SI. We eliminated KIMBERLY because she was still painted in dazzle into April 1945. I did a search of USS YORKTOWN's War Diary sometime after doing the "Brute Force" search and came up blank for USS LUCE being alongside USS YORKTOWN ON 27 FEBRUARY 1945. BUT, the 80-G dates are suspect and often wrong. Plus, sometimes carriers didn't catch ALL the destroyers that came alongside them during busy periods of OPS. I got off on other things and never got into USS LUCE's War Diary to see if she mentions going alongside USS YORKTOWN at ANY point in February-March timeframe. I'm pretty sure this is LUCE, but not at all sure that I have a firm date. If you desire building the ship as she appeared in dazzle, a positive ID for this photo is unimportant. You have more than enough images for LUCE as she appeared in dazzle. |
Author: | Rick E Davis [ Sat Dec 19, 2015 11:44 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: USS Luce DD-522 Fletcher Class 1/144 |
I have had a strong suspicion that this photo dates from March 1945 or even a bit later. The wear and tear on the paint job of the destroyer (likely USS LUCE) would seem to be more in-line with the service encountered by then and seen on other destroyers with more solid dated photos. Thanks for the War Diary entry for February 1945. I'm going to go out on a limb and say that the downtime 16-28 February 1945 would have been a perfect time for "tasking" the crew to do some painting. I'm surprised that March and April 1945 War Diaries are NOT available. Ships turned in War Diary entries once a month so at least March SHOULD be available somewhere. On my next trip to NARA I'll check the records there. I'm not sure where "Fold3" gets their War Diary entries from. The War Diaries were microfilmed at some point, or at least some of them were, and those may be the ones that they uploaded. War Diaries were normally hand-written day-to-day and THEN a type-written version(s) were produced (some on standard size 8.5x11 paper and others on Deck Log size paper) at least by the beginning of the next month if not as they went along. Normally a given month's entry was dated on the 1st of the following month, and sent to the next higher command level. Higher commands used them to generate their unit War Diaries. NARA has both hand-written and/or typed War Diaries "paper" versions in their collection. They hand-written ones can be a chore to read ... unless all hand printed and not cursive. Some were even written in #2 pencil, talk about a mess to read. Also, sometimes the Deck Logs provide more/additional info not found in the War Diaries. |
Author: | LoB [ Sat Dec 19, 2015 9:12 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: USS Luce DD-522 Fletcher Class 1/144 |
Good info Rick! FWIW I did check the March 1945 War Diary of the USS Yorktown. Pretty much the only Ships mentioned by name were those in her own Task Group. On at least two occasions the War Diary mentioned "Numerous Destroyers alongside for "Mail and Personnel transfer" or something like that. I am positive I have Luce deck logs on Hard Drive somewhere . . they are hand written mostly in pencil and can be difficult to decipher. I have been collecting data about the Luce for 10+ years. I will try to find them and will post relevant data here. I will continue to research this. But FWIW, I highly doubt that this is the Luce based on the fact that the starboard side of #1 38mm gun is NOT Light Grey/Ocean Grey as can clearly be seen in the photos of Luce in Dazzle Camo. In your photo the starboard side of #1 38mm is either Ocean Grey or Light Grey . . not a combination with an upper left to lower right demarc. Check also the raft in your photo and photos of Luce in Dazzle Camo . . in the photos of Luce in Dazzle the aft portion of the Raft is Dull Black and the forward portion of the raft is Light Grey. Unless there was an interim order re: painting out the Dazzle before the order to Measure 21 . . . . ?? I will continue research . . Thanks again for your illuminating responses Rick . . BTW . . where can I order your Books on the Fletchers?? |
Author: | Rick E Davis [ Sat Dec 19, 2015 11:13 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: USS Luce DD-522 Fletcher Class 1/144 |
As I said, some destroyers painted out of dazzle in stages. Plus, even while in dazzle, several destroyers while "touching up" modified the pattern applied in the yard. A common change was to paint the whole side of a 5-in gun mount one color. Life rafts were repainted as well. Plus this isn't a great photo. The photo is largely over exposed and the areas that appear darker are in the shadow and the rest of the destroyer is generally exposed to a strong sun. Unless they applied an overall primer coat, which if the crew did the repainting by hand that was quite unlikely, the various shades underneath would bleed through changing the tone. The frustrating part of going through the War Diary of the "large units" like USS YORKTOWN during intense operational periods, is that when multiple destroyers are coming alongside for various purposes, whoever is keeping notes can get lazy in noting which units did come alongside. In LUCE's DANFS entries, it says she was running escort to supply runs in February and to the end of March 1945. On 1 April she was assigned to Radar Picket duty and remained on that duty (likely off and on) until lost. If she retrieved one of YORKTOWN's air crews, she could have made a run to her to return them. Try going into April 1945 of YORKTOWN's War Diary. YORKTOWN appears to have been making strikes on Okinawa from about 23 March until at least 7 April 1945 almost constantly. Returning a down crew would be a common exercise. Without, more photos of LUCE, we may not ever know exactly what she looked like every month in 1944 into 1945 at the time of her loss. Very few of the destroyers have that kind of photographic coverage. I'm still pretty certain the destroyer is USS LUCE by process of elimination. I went through ALL the photos of all Square-Bridge FLETCHERS and the only ones with those features I noted on the image, were the the early Bethlehem-SI built Square-Bridge units. ISHERWOOD was damaged at IWO JIMA while still in dazzle camo and went stateside for repairs. KIMBERLY was still in dazzle in April 1945. That left LUCE. In most of my IDs of unidentified FLETCHERS (and other destroyers), I look at the configuration as the highest discriminate. Camo and paint jobs in general don't remain constant, particularly during the transition period in early 1945. |
Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |