The Ship Model Forum

The Ship Modelers Source
It is currently Sat Jun 21, 2025 11:14 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Apr 01, 2010 5:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 2:31 pm
Posts: 1091
With ships like the Enterprise, Saratoga, Ranger, and about 150 CVEs surplus after the war, how about a good purpose for them after they finished their war careers. Also, with thousands of surplus C-47s, B-25s, and C-46s being used commercially, why not extend their range? How would using these ships as stationary Airports work? If they were placed around the world's Oceans, they would have opened the world even further to connection. The islands of the CVEs would just need to be taken off though.

_________________
Current builds:
Hobby Boss 1/700 Type VIIC U-Boat for my AH

Planned builds:
3 more 1/700 AH submarines


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Apr 01, 2010 5:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 6:00 pm
Posts: 12326
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Making all of those cargo planes sea- and carrier-worthy would be quite a chore; they'd have to be strengthened to take the stress of a carrier landing. Furthermore, the money and manpower needed to run those floating airports would likely make it an impractical exercise - it would be more efficient to just design and build more intercontinental-ranged aircraft that can use existing land-based airports.

_________________
De quoi s'agit-il?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Apr 01, 2010 5:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 2:31 pm
Posts: 1091
Yeah. True. Do ya think I can get away with saying that it was jus a joke?? :tongue: :joker:

_________________
Current builds:
Hobby Boss 1/700 Type VIIC U-Boat for my AH

Planned builds:
3 more 1/700 AH submarines


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Apr 01, 2010 5:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 6:00 pm
Posts: 12326
Location: Ottawa, Canada
It's probably not noon yet in Hawaii :P

Edit: Oh wait, yes it is! Erm, some spot of the Pacific, for your sake :P

_________________
De quoi s'agit-il?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Apr 01, 2010 5:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 2:31 pm
Posts: 1091
Oh well...It still is a nice idea, other than paying all of those stupid air fares. :joker: :tongue:

_________________
Current builds:
Hobby Boss 1/700 Type VIIC U-Boat for my AH

Planned builds:
3 more 1/700 AH submarines


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Apr 01, 2010 7:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 10:12 am
Posts: 510
Location: long way SSE of Woomera
join them altogether ie a pontoon bridge if you like.
Then you could drive over the oceans. :cool_2:

_________________
My job was to comfort the disturbed & Disturb the comfortable.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat May 01, 2010 7:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 2:31 pm
Posts: 1091
HMAS wrote:
join them altogether ie a pontoon bridge if you like.
Then you could drive over the oceans. :cool_2:


lol

_________________
Current builds:
Hobby Boss 1/700 Type VIIC U-Boat for my AH

Planned builds:
3 more 1/700 AH submarines


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat May 01, 2010 2:17 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2009 9:28 pm
Posts: 2126
Location: Egg Harbor Twp, NJ
The CVE's were built specifically to be CVEs, at least after the initial freighter conversions. They couldn't handle much more than a TBF/TBM on that size deck.

As to the C-47s, many are still flying. Military and civilian versions were upgraded to turbo-prop engines. The predecessor to the AC-130 gunship was the AC-47. Whever I fly to an island, I always check the more commercial, non-airline, areas of the field. I usually see some DC-3/C-47 being used for inter-island cargo.

On the other planes, many were used as fire bombers.

But you're right in one respect, much WW II military equipment from the Pacific never made it back to the US and was intentionally made unusable, after stripping, before the US pulled out. Most of the PTs were burned instead of being left to the islanders. Same thing with trucks and jeeps.

_________________
Russ


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu May 06, 2010 2:06 pm 
Saratoga was worn out seriously, as was Ranger. Enterprise would have made a decent LPH. Many CVE were converted into merchant service. Remove everything above the main deck was the first step.


Top
  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 4:47 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 1:50 pm
Posts: 267
I had reason to be talking about some of the old carriers yesterday.The thing that sticks in my mind was a hull survey done on one ,with the idea of turning her into an offshore major medical center,and the flight deck would be retained aft to allow medivac choppers to land and take off.Would you believe that we put a sledge hammer through the shell plating just below the bilge keel???Now think a minute.This wasn,t all over the ship just in spots.As well as that we found spongy feeling steel under the flight deck at the midships location.When we cut a hole the steel just fell away in areas around the hole.Now this ship served her country well for many years.I do believe that mothball neglect and just plain fatigue caught up with her.It turned out to be cheaper to build this vessel out of a containership that just turned four and was sold by her company as being "old". The idea is sound for small aircraft and island nations but plain and simple it,s way to costly to take an old carrier and refit her for these duties.The cost would eat up maintenance and profit monies for too many years before it was cost effective. commodore 4


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 2 guests


You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group