The Navy, in their infinite wisdom, decided to use the same designation in most cases. It simplified things in war time but makes our jobs as historians more difficult. If you were able to find records of work you *might* be able to ascertain the differences, but in my decade or so of archival research, I've only seen one official departure report that listed the actual paints used, the majority simply state "painted in accordance with current directives."
However....
It looks like she repainted in late December '44/early January 1945, which might be too early for the neutral paints. The main directives to the fleet went out in February, but we do have a
directive from January 3 1945 saying that Mare Island had already changed her manufacturing formula. The question is where Hunters Point got their paint (this was the availability in which Alaska repainted) and how quickly Mare Island started shipping it. Might be a question you could solve at
NARA San Bruno but I can't guarantee it.
_________________
Tracy White -
Researcher@Large"Let the evidence guide the research. Do not have a preconceived agenda which will only distort the result."
-
Barbara Tuchman