The Ship Model Forum

The Ship Modelers Source
It is currently Mon Jul 07, 2025 6:05 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 734 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 ... 37  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Jul 09, 2010 12:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2007 6:29 pm
Posts: 1975
bwross11 wrote:
Dick,

I got the Floating Drydock plans of the Quincy today, and as I was studying them I noticed that there is a step level on the Navigation Bridge just forward of the searchlights; you know anything about this?

Bruce


I am not sure what you are describing. The photos do not support one major area of the nav-bridge being a step or two above another major area. However, if you are talking about a small platform (a few square feet) above the rest, it would probably be a semaphore station. It would be elevated to ensure that the receiving ship could clearly see the signals.

Now the comm-bridge would be a different thing. That definitely was on two levels. That was the reason for having that level 1 1/2 levels in height. The main portion, aft of the conning tower, was at the O2 level. However, placing the conning tower at that level would not allow its viewing ports to clear the top of turret II and see the bow. So the base for the conning tower was raised about 1/2 level above the main comm-bridge deck, and the CT mounted at that height. The top of the CT set the height for the nav-bridge. The CT issue was true for all 7 ships of the class, and those who have claimed that the Quincy's and Vincennes' bridges were lower than those on the other 5 are in error.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Jul 18, 2010 12:07 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 7:17 pm
Posts: 39
Greetings friends,

My next major project will be the Trumpeter 1/350 San Francisco 1942.

It looks like a really fun kit to build with lots of detail though I'm having alittle problem figuring out the color scheme. Is it just me or is the whole ship just 1 color? I find that part the boring part :( But on a side note; Looking at the front of the box, side of the box, and color guide, it seems that theres like 2 schemes and I'm not referring to the camo look. 1 is just the bland same color look while the other seems to have the half Navy Blue/half Haze Grey hull and Haze Grey superstructures. Can anyone help confirm this form me?

Also I'm having alittle difficulty figuring out the waterline from the box/color guide. Now the color guide seems to use that raised area at the midsection of the hull as the guide for the waterline while the half Navy Blue/half Haze Grey shows the waterline to be much thinner(maybe 2mm). Also looking bondoman's awesome San Francisco; it seems his waterline doesn't extend to the full height of that raised area.

Also for the portholes; would you recommend that I drill them open or just leave them as is with the closed indentation?

Thanks for the response people. I just really want to make this one sweet and badass

_________________
Brian D

Completed Projects:
Tamiya BB-63 USS Missouri 1:700
Trumpeter DDG-51 USS Arleigh Burke 1:350
Trumpeter DD-537 The Sullivans DD537 1:350

Current Project:
Trumpeter CA-38 USS San Francisco Heavy Cruiser 1942 1:350


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Aug 24, 2010 3:59 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 1:50 pm
Posts: 267
HI, I don,t normally bother folks with "piddly" questions,but this time I have to.I have the 1/350 model of the U.S.S. SAN FRANCISCO.I have started the build and was wondering,Was she ever done in what we call haze grey with natural wood decks?If so I am going to have to acquire another so I have one that way(U.S.S.NEW ORLEANS,or another?)And the U.S.S. SAN FRANCISCO as she looked in the BIG BLUE FLEET colors.This ,by the way is a nice shipmodel. thank you for your help. commodore4 TRACY WHITE-have you ever found a home for the BUCKLEY??,I am still open to giving her a home.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Aug 24, 2010 4:26 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2009 9:28 pm
Posts: 2126
Location: Egg Harbor Twp, NJ
Don't know how much color shift there was here and you can't see the deck but...

Attachment:
sanfran Sep 1945.jpg
sanfran Sep 1945.jpg [ 78.28 KiB | Viewed 5785 times ]


Attachment:
sanfran 9-45.jpg
sanfran 9-45.jpg [ 68.19 KiB | Viewed 5785 times ]


Attachment:
sanfran Mast Sep 1945.jpg
sanfran Mast Sep 1945.jpg [ 76.78 KiB | Viewed 5785 times ]

_________________
Russ


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 12:35 am 
Hello, Just getting back into modeling and decided to build 1/700 Trumpy Astoria as a start. I could use some help on a couple of things.

1. What size are the portholes...12", 16", ?? Did the Navy have standard sizes, or different for each class?
2. What about the size of those pipes (scuttles???) sticking out of the hull that seem to be draining water?
3.

Thanks,
Paul

Great and informative forum -btw


Top
  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Sep 25, 2010 6:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 4:31 pm
Posts: 117
Location: Aberdeen, Scotland, UK
Hi folks,

Just stumbled across this pic of the Vincennes:

http://mysite.verizon.net/resttsdu/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderpictures/1942_08_07_CA-44_VINCENNES_salvo_1200x.jpg

It's on one of the pages of the Astoria CL-90 site:

http://mighty90.com/Beginnings.html

Not very clear, but a nice view.

Mike. :smallsmile:


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Sep 30, 2010 7:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2007 11:59 am
Posts: 782
Advert in back of the CW USN Battleships in Color lists the next in the full color series as USS Minneapolis CA - 36.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Oct 01, 2010 3:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 12:01 am
Posts: 1677
Location: Corvallis, Oregon, USA
Paul,

Which Astoria are you modeling? CA-34 or CL-90? I assume it is CA-34 since it is on this thread.

I can answer questions about details of the the CL-90 Cleveland class.

_________________
A collision at sea will ruin your entire day. Aristotle


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Oct 28, 2010 4:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2009 3:55 pm
Posts: 3125
Location: Hawaii
Hey guys, for the upcoming Gun Cruiser GB I'm planning on doing the USS Tuscaloosa (CA-37) in her 1944 fit. I'm going to use Trumpy's 1/700 USS San Francisco 1944 kit and have read that you can make either cruiser with it. I was wondering if anyone has attempted this yet or has any knowledge of how close the kit is to the ship. I've compared the kit to detailed drawings of CA-38 and have found it pretty much spot on but I have no clue about CA-37. I've only found a few photos of her from this time period and they aren't proving much help detail wise. I'm specifically looking to depict her during March of 1944 while she operating in the Atlantic with the USS Ranger (CV-4).

I'm planning on including her in a long-term dio centered around the Ranger tied up to Pier 1 at NAS Quonset Point along with the USS Ellyson (DD-454) and the USS Macomb (DD-458) on March 28, 1944. I found photo of said event in Robert Cressman's book "USS Ranger: The USN's first flattop, From Keel To Mast, 1934-1946)". The photo is credited as being from the National Archives; Photo (NA, 80-G-394586). If anyone has found that photo during a trip to the Archives please PM me. The printed version in the book is rather dark and if I try to blow up a scan it gets all pixelated due to the printing process.

Any and all help is appreciated as always.

Thanks,
-Mike

_________________
Drawing Board:
1/700 Whiff USS Leyte and escorts 1984
1/700 Whiff USN Modernized CAs 1984
1/700 Whiff ASW Showdown - FFs vs SSGN 1984

Slipway:
1/700 Whiff USN ASW Hunter Killer Group Dio 1984


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Oct 28, 2010 6:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 5:49 pm
Posts: 1611
Location: The beautiful PNW
Mike,

Let me do some rooting around, I believe there were subtle differences like 20mm and radar layout and such but mostly the same. The only big difference I can think of right off the top of my head was the last 5/25's on Port and Starboard were not aligned like the SF or the other NO class. On the San Francisco the center of the 3 guns on deck was set inboard towards the centerline, the CA-37 had the last pair inset. She also maintained her individual shields around her 5/25's ala 1942 San Francisco vs the one continuos shield. She also had a 20mm gallery under the bridge, much like the Quincy had and similar to the one the New Orleans had in her later career.

Let me do some more digging around, I know I have more.

HTH
Matt

_________________
In the yards right now:
USS Utah AG-16
On Hold
1/350 USS Portland CA-33 1942
1/350 Trumpeter Texas with a twist


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Oct 28, 2010 6:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2009 3:55 pm
Posts: 3125
Location: Hawaii
Matt,

Thanks a bunch man! Now that you mention the 5" shields I recall reading that CA-37 had her after most mounts (abreast the after funnel) replaced with quad 1.1" guns in 42/43. Were those swapped for 40mms (twins or quads) or replaced with 5"/25s. I can't discern from the photos I have. Sorry I can't be more specific with the date, the book was rather vague and its the only mention of this change I've found. Also, did these cruisers keep their 5"/25s their whole careers or did they upgrade to 5"/38s? I'm 99% sure they kept the 25s but I want to be sure.

-Mike

_________________
Drawing Board:
1/700 Whiff USS Leyte and escorts 1984
1/700 Whiff USN Modernized CAs 1984
1/700 Whiff ASW Showdown - FFs vs SSGN 1984

Slipway:
1/700 Whiff USN ASW Hunter Killer Group Dio 1984


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Oct 28, 2010 7:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2007 6:29 pm
Posts: 1975
Cliffy B wrote:
Now that you mention the 5" shields I recall reading that CA-37 had her after most mounts (abreast the after funnel) replaced with quad 1.1" guns in 42/43. Were those swapped for 40mms (twins or quads) or replaced with 5"/25s.


This comes from Stefan Terzibaschitsch's US Cruisers book, and he was 100% wrong about this. No 5" were ever replaced by smaller guns. He misinterpreted why the photos of Tuscaloosa's aftermost 5" positions didn't match the rest of the class. (It isn't his only mistake about this class.)

Some of the major differences between the '44 San Fran and the '44 Tuscaloosa are as follows:

1) Bridge. Starting from the bottom up, the first difference was the 40MM positioning. Pre-war, San Fran and Minnie had the raised 1/2 level deck for the comm bridge, and the 40MM were eventually positioned at that level in those two. New Orleans and Tuscaloosa never had that raised deck, so their 40MM were positioned at the original comm bridge level, 1/2 level lower than San Fran. However, the 20MM galleries in front of the bridge were at the same level for Tuscaloosa and San Fran. (At the raised 1/2 deck level.) Tuscaloosa's pilothouse was wider - less of the original pilothouse was trimmed off when the ship was modernized. Also, Tuscaloosa had the flag bags at the back of the bridge at the pilothouse level, rather than the 40MM level as in San Fran. The exact shape of the back of the bridge block was different between the two. The open bridge level was different, too. On San Fran, the original '43 modernized config had the square-faced open bridge going straight back to the back end of the bridge block. Later, the forward part was enlarged by adding triangles to the sides of the front part, so front to back, in '44, San Fran's open bridge started at the '43 width, widened out between the bridge face and the back of the pilothouse, then abruptly narrowed back to the original width. On Tuscaloosa, The open bridge also widened from the front of the bridge to the back of the pilothouse, but then retained the extra width to almost the back of the bridge block.

2) 5" mounts. As was mentioned, Tuscaloosa was unique in having the aftermost 5" as the inset pair. She retained this to the end. She also had 5" 25's to the end. (Of all the US cruisers that mounted the 5" 25, only Savannah and Honolulu upgraded to 5" 38's.)

3) 40MM. The forward 40MM differences have been previously mentioned. However, one of the hangar-roof 40MM was differently positioned on Tuscaloosa. On all 4 of the class, the port side 40MM had to clear the remaining boat/aircraft crane, and so was positioned aft of it. San Fran and Minnie had the starboard side mount further forward, centered somewhat forward of the original starboard side crane position. On Tuscaloosa, the starboard mount was further aft, closer to the back "corner" of the deck, and she had a 20MM mounted forward of it. On New Orleans, the starboard 40MM basically mirrored the port side position.

4) 20MM. You will need photos to get the exact positions, however I will point out a few significant differences. Because Tuscaloosa refitted in the Atlantic, she never had any 20MM on the bow forward of the anchor chains. Instead, she had more aft, just forward of the quarterdeck 40MM tubs. The galleries adjacent to the stacks were also very different from San Fran.

5) Mainmast. By '44, San Fran had a heavier mainmast, with a platform intended to mount the raid-tracking height finder radar. This necessitated installing short trailing legs on the mast to further support it. Tuscaloosa had only an SG mounted on her lighter mainmast, and no trailing legs.

This should get you started, but you need to find photos. Warship Pictorial #7 is the best source for Tuscaloosa pics.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Oct 28, 2010 7:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2009 3:55 pm
Posts: 3125
Location: Hawaii
Thanks guys! I ordered the Ship craft volume on the New Orleans Class and it should be here in a week or so. I tried looking for the Warship Pictorial but since its been out of print for so long the cheapest price I can find is $50.... :Mad_5: I did read earlier in the thread that the Ship Craft book is basically the WP book with an added kit review section. Is that true? If not, does anyone have a copy of WP #7 they'd be willing to part with?

_________________
Drawing Board:
1/700 Whiff USS Leyte and escorts 1984
1/700 Whiff USN Modernized CAs 1984
1/700 Whiff ASW Showdown - FFs vs SSGN 1984

Slipway:
1/700 Whiff USN ASW Hunter Killer Group Dio 1984


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Oct 29, 2010 12:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2007 6:29 pm
Posts: 1975
The Shipcraft book does not have the same photo selection as the WP#7, especially with regard to the modernized Tuscaloosa. This is no reflection on the Shipcraft book, since the focus of that publication is on model building, and there is not a '44 Tuscaloosa kit to compare to the real thing. Navsource and the NH site don't have the good Tuscaloosa aerials of the #7 book either. :huh:


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Dec 02, 2010 5:21 am 
Hi!
Please, look on this picture (below). This is my reconstruction camouflage Ms-12s for USS "Tuscaloosa" in 1942 from photos. This is one of two version camouflage Ms-12 carried on "Tuscaloosa" in 1941-42 (Atlantic - Iceland duty).

Image

Sorry for my english - I speak polish language... :-(

MacGregor (Poland)


Top
  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Dec 02, 2010 7:42 am 
... and "Tuscaloosa" in 1944 :-)
Image


Top
  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Dec 02, 2010 8:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 7:44 am
Posts: 2
Location: Poland
Below - USS "San Francisco" in 1944 :wave_1:


Image

_________________
MacGregor


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Dec 03, 2010 6:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 7:44 am
Posts: 2
Location: Poland
And more view of the "Tuscaloosa" :smallsmile:
1939
Image

1941
Image

1943
Image

_________________
MacGregor


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Dec 03, 2010 11:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2007 6:29 pm
Posts: 1975
The biggest problem I see with these drawings is the 5" gun disposition. There were 6 on the maindeck. The middle pair should be directly aft of the forward pair - the distance from the centerline was the same. On Tuscaloosa, it was the after pair that was inset. That was unique to Tuscaloosa.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Dec 06, 2010 9:02 am 
Hello,
I see that you guys have a lot of knowledge about warships details.
I'm trying to find out the number of 40mm guns and radars carried by New Orleans, Minneapolis and San Francisco in late 1943/early 1944. I know that they probably had at least 16 and not more than 24.
Radars: air search SK, FC Mk3 and Mk4. Is that correct?

Thank you in advance
MAx


Top
  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 734 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 ... 37  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests


You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group