The Ship Model Forum

The Ship Modelers Source
It is currently Sat Jul 12, 2025 3:04 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 307 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ... 16  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Jul 30, 2011 11:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2010 6:47 pm
Posts: 3134
Location: Oslo, Norway
chuck wrote:
I prefer to do a Tone class CA in 1/350 configured as 1941-1942. I am debating whether to buy Tamiya's 1944 Tone now, or wait to see if Tamiya would release a 1941 Chikuma. As a high level overview, beside radar and proliferation of 25mm guns, how much additional modification did Tone undergo 1941-1944?

Besides radar and proliferation of 25mm guns you will also need to remove the AA command platform on the top of the bridge(you can use theIJN Mikuma or IJN Mogami 1941-1942 verion of Tamiya's 1/350 range, with some modifications) and add exercise aiming device on the main turrets of IJN Tone/IJN Chikuma.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Jul 30, 2011 11:48 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 10:56 am
Posts: 8833
Location: New York City
I don't think you can necessarily count on Tamiya releasing a Chikuma. They've shown a remarkable reluctance to spend additonal marketing $s on releasing variants of current kits in 1/350, such as an early war Kagero class DD. The Yukikaze kit sprue layout is easily set up for alternative parts, but none are forthcoming, according to my sources.

The exception seems to be the CA version of Mogami, which can easily be converted to Mikuma. I believe the same of Tone; it's kit layout is such that the deletion of fits is pretty easily accomplished.

It all comes down to sales.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Jul 30, 2011 6:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2010 6:47 pm
Posts: 3134
Location: Oslo, Norway
With almost zero effort you can make from a 1944 IJN Tone a 1944 IJN Chikuma, while from a 1938 IJN Mikuma a 1938 IJN Mogami and from a 1942 IJN Mogami a 1942 IJN Mikuma(the main mast needs to be changed).
Is crime to the modeling world, that Tamiya dont release a 1944 or 1942 IJN Suzuya or IJN Kumano(like Fujimi' with an all gun version of IJN Huyga) !
Damn you Japanese marketing !


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Sep 06, 2011 2:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 10:56 am
Posts: 8833
Location: New York City
I've continued to follow-up on the open rear bulkhead question posed by the Tamiya 1/350 Tone part C40. Apparently, a number of photos were recently offered for auction on Yahoo Japan that were associated (if I have the story straight) with a group or class of seaplane mechanics, some of who served aboard Chikuma. Three photos are posted below. The second shows the corner support of the port side aft bulk head. Ship ID and year (1942 or later) was based upon cap insignia ID. I invite you to draw your own conclusion :smallsmile:


Attachments:
Chikuma 12-7cm HA batteries, crew, 1942+.jpg
Chikuma 12-7cm HA batteries, crew, 1942+.jpg [ 95.89 KiB | Viewed 5967 times ]
Chikuma crew Yahoo JP #2.jpg
Chikuma crew Yahoo JP #2.jpg [ 111.3 KiB | Viewed 5967 times ]
Chikuma crew Yahoo JP #3.jpg
Chikuma crew Yahoo JP #3.jpg [ 123.88 KiB | Viewed 5967 times ]
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Sep 07, 2011 4:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 5:36 pm
Posts: 2160
Location: About 50 miles away from the Gulf of Mexico ( traveling W is you do so :)
Quality is very good on those shots Dan, i bet there are still shots out there we haven't seen yet.. second photo now tells me that Tamiya's bulkhead is wrong :Mad_5: looks to me the port side was completely exposed with no bulkhead extending towards the middle.. this keeps getting better and better. thanks Dan!



Jose :wave_1:


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Sep 26, 2011 2:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 1:21 pm
Posts: 3383
Location: equidistant to everywhere
Did the Tone have degaussing cables?

_________________
Assessing the impact of new area rug under modeling table.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Sep 26, 2011 2:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2010 6:47 pm
Posts: 3134
Location: Oslo, Norway
Yes, both IJN Tone and IJN Chikuma.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Sep 26, 2011 9:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 1:21 pm
Posts: 3383
Location: equidistant to everywhere
Tamiya appears to have neglected the degaussing cables.

_________________
Assessing the impact of new area rug under modeling table.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Sep 26, 2011 10:10 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 10:56 am
Posts: 8833
Location: New York City
They probably want you to buy their aftermarket version.


Attachments:
tam12630.jpg
tam12630.jpg [ 36.49 KiB | Viewed 5805 times ]
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2011 5:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2010 6:47 pm
Posts: 3134
Location: Oslo, Norway
Chikuma in 1/350 by Tamiya is canceled, in favor of a new 1/350/1/700 project.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2011 7:08 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 10:56 am
Posts: 8833
Location: New York City
I'm surprised that it was even under consideration.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2011 3:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 5:36 pm
Posts: 2160
Location: About 50 miles away from the Gulf of Mexico ( traveling W is you do so :)
Atma wrote:
Chikuma in 1/350 by Tamiya is canceled, in favor of a new 1/350/1/700 project.



no more clues ?? :big_grin:


Jose :wave_1:


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2011 5:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 1:21 pm
Posts: 3383
Location: equidistant to everywhere
Dan K wrote:
I'm surprised that it was even under consideration.


Maybe the 4 versions of Mogami mold didn't pay off, or maybe the Tone class is too little changed to cause people to want to buy more than 1.

_________________
Assessing the impact of new area rug under modeling table.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2011 6:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2010 6:47 pm
Posts: 3134
Location: Oslo, Norway
J. Soca wrote:


no more clues ?? :big_grin:


Jose :wave_1:

Yes, of course. Its about a new retooling.

Dan K wrote:
I'm surprised that it was even under consideration.

Several test models of a 1941/1942 IJN Chikuma was given as a present to foregin Tamiya's importers. My test model was only a 1941/1942 era main bridge.

chuck wrote:

Maybe the 4 versions of Mogami mold didn't pay off, or maybe the Tone class is too little changed to cause people to want to buy more than 1.

3 versions, not 4.
The 1944 IJN Mogami and 1938 IJN Mikuma sold very well, the 1941 IJN Mogami on the other hand had low sales.Cost wise was not high for Tamiya though, an IJN Mogami in 1941 version.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Oct 04, 2011 2:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 1:21 pm
Posts: 3383
Location: equidistant to everywhere
What is the change between 1941 Chikuma and 1944 Tone main bridge?

_________________
Assessing the impact of new area rug under modeling table.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Oct 05, 2011 12:00 am 
Jose :wave_1:[/quote]
Yes, of course. Its about a new retooling.

Obviously, it is going to be Yamato - Musashi 1/350 new tooling.


Top
  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Oct 05, 2011 1:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 1:21 pm
Posts: 3383
Location: equidistant to everywhere
If you are wrong, I will kill you.

_________________
Assessing the impact of new area rug under modeling table.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2011 10:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 5:36 pm
Posts: 2160
Location: About 50 miles away from the Gulf of Mexico ( traveling W is you do so :)
chuck wrote:
If you are wrong, I will kill you.


you can take the pill now Chuck because ain't happening :rolf_3:



Jose


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Nov 09, 2011 10:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2011 12:01 pm
Posts: 454
NEW photo etch from fly hawk for tone!!!! :woo_hoo:
Hopefully you can use it for chikuma too!!!
http://www.flyhawkmodel.com/en/product.asp?code=700192


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Nov 10, 2011 8:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2010 6:47 pm
Posts: 3134
Location: Oslo, Norway
You can use it for the Fujimi's 1/700 IJN Chikuma. The Fujimi's 1/700 IJN Chikuma(waterline and full hull model) is the same as the 1/700 IJN Tone. The only difference is a bit different arrangement of the light (single 25 mm AA) guns on the stern.
It also can be used for the 1945 version of 1/700 IJN Tone by Fujimi.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 307 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ... 16  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 2 guests


You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group