The Ship Model Forum

The Ship Modelers Source
It is currently Thu Jul 10, 2025 5:08 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 359 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 18  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Apr 28, 2014 2:59 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 10:56 am
Posts: 8833
Location: New York City
L-Arsenal also offers a brass PE set specifically designed for Japanese merchants and IJN auxiliaries. There is much to like about this set. It comes with both a central catwalk modified for UNREP use (with short sidewalls, attached railings and proper ribbing on the flooring), as well as another, more typical catwalk, also with railings, that can be placed alongside the modified version and glued together for the correct configuration. It also comes with several different types of trestle supports, which are also beautifully rendered.

This was my first choice but, I ran into a few unexpected hurdles. Most were minor: the sidewalls of the UNREP catwalk are not scored, making the bending of them into position along their full length a bit problematic. Patience and good bending technique are a must. For rivet-counters like myself, the number of railing bars was also on the low side, one bar instead of three bar. There is also so some uncertainty about using which of the various trestles types should be used, and in what order. I found this particularly confusing as I can only see one general type in use along the entire length of catwalk. Again, these are extremely minor issues.

More problematic for me was the height of the assembled trestles. They were simply too short to allow the ends of the catwalk to align with the 01 deck levels at either end.


Attachments:
DSCN6792small.jpg
DSCN6792small.jpg [ 175.14 KiB | Viewed 1725 times ]
DSCN6796small.jpg
DSCN6796small.jpg [ 173.65 KiB | Viewed 1725 times ]
Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Apr 28, 2014 3:04 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 10:56 am
Posts: 8833
Location: New York City
Rather than attempt a fix, I decided on a third option – styrene walkways with PE railings, trestles, piping and access ladders. It turns out that a U-shaped styrene channel works perfectly as a main catwalk, complimented by strips of V-groove styrene painted deck tan and washed with burnt umber, just like the wooden decking. I was also able to attach proper railings and brass rod for additional piping. The piping took a couple of tries. Originally, I tried to depict hem with some spacing between the lines, but the result was very uneven. I redid the piping with the lines nestled next to one another. It made for a neater appearance though, honestly, one would never know if not for the tyranny of the digital lens.

The biggest challenge was the trestles and getting the proper height. After some thought, I hit upon what I think was a wonderful solution: I separated the trestles from the Fujimi SS PE catwalk, turned them upside down, and glued the footings to the underside of the styrene catwalk, taking care to space them evenly. It worked out perfectly.


Attachments:
DSCN6728small.jpg
DSCN6728small.jpg [ 195.26 KiB | Viewed 1726 times ]
DSCN6729small.jpg
DSCN6729small.jpg [ 188.71 KiB | Viewed 1726 times ]
DSCN6789small.jpg
DSCN6789small.jpg [ 125.32 KiB | Viewed 1726 times ]
DSCN6788small.jpg
DSCN6788small.jpg [ 87.97 KiB | Viewed 1726 times ]
DSCN6790small.jpg
DSCN6790small.jpg [ 120.46 KiB | Viewed 1726 times ]
Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Apr 28, 2014 3:05 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 10:56 am
Posts: 8833
Location: New York City
The only open question that remains is whether or not to lay down something to depict the ribbing along the bottom of the trough. I will ultimately be adding refueling hose in this space, so I’m uncertain how much of the ribbing would even be visible. I did find a length of stainless steel railing from the GMM IJN Auxiliary PE set that would work as ribbing. (Depicted, but not glued into place.)


Attachments:
DSCN6786small.jpg
DSCN6786small.jpg [ 149.92 KiB | Viewed 1727 times ]
Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Apr 29, 2014 6:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 9:14 pm
Posts: 453
Location: A Scot in New Zealand
I think the gmm railing is a good idea . Too course to be used as railing its ideal in a semi concealed area where it adds texture to the overall detail in an area.

I like your fix with the walkway. Good lateral thinking. With lots of pipes and fiddley bits I can see this is going to be impressive :)

_________________
"The vast majority of Iraqis want to live in a peaceful, free world. And we will find these people and we will bring them to justice."
Washington DC, 27 October, 2003. President George W Bush


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Jun 30, 2014 3:16 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 10:56 am
Posts: 8833
Location: New York City
It’s been a while. I knew I had been derailed but I did not realize it’s been two months since the last posting. Basically, vacation, a nasty respiratory virus, life, etc all conspired to interrupt my focus, progress, and continuity. I am only now starting to resume the build. This model has no chance of making this year’s NATS now, unfortunately.

Things began to go south when I brilliantly dropped the aft catwalk. Railings were bent and dislodged. Piping went flying. Worst of all, the brittleness of the stainless steel folds became apparent when some of the trestles snapped off. (In this regard, brass is far better as it is a more forgiving metal.) Repairs were unsatisfactory.

So, I set it aside for the time being and attempted to build the forward catwalk. While the catwalk itself was relatively straightforward, a new problem arose with the trestle footings. The forward catwalk rises with the main deck as it approaches the bow. The kit piece trestles are etched in a way so that, when used as designed, the position of the trestle pillars is slightly staggered, so as to allow the catwalk to rise in a gradual curve that parallels the main deck. However, that means leaving them attached to the kit catwalk, which really does not work with my scratch-built sections.

Detaching the trestles and turning them upside down, so as to use the footers as attachment points to the underside of the catwalk, only really works for the two trestles closest to the bridge, where the main deck remains flat. Otherwise, the offset sets them at an angle. The only way to compensate it to trim the ends, to get a roughly level trestle. It worked with some degree of success but, it really doesn’t look so great.

At this point, I’m waiting for another solution to present itself. In the meantime, I am using the catwalks as markers in my reworking of the deck piping (which will be glued down later in the process). I also finished up reworking the deck, the access hatches on the main deck, the structures that carry skylights, and gooseneck intakes.


Attachments:
DSCN6852small.jpg
DSCN6852small.jpg [ 39.86 KiB | Viewed 1629 times ]
DSCN6853small.jpg
DSCN6853small.jpg [ 51.79 KiB | Viewed 1629 times ]
DSCN6854small.jpg
DSCN6854small.jpg [ 78.27 KiB | Viewed 1629 times ]
Forward catwalk trestle with offsetsmall.jpg
Forward catwalk trestle with offsetsmall.jpg [ 66.63 KiB | Viewed 1629 times ]
DSCN6901small.jpg
DSCN6901small.jpg [ 74.72 KiB | Viewed 1629 times ]
DSCN6904small.jpg
DSCN6904small.jpg [ 64.82 KiB | Viewed 1629 times ]
DSCN6906small.jpg
DSCN6906small.jpg [ 56.48 KiB | Viewed 1629 times ]


Last edited by Dan K on Mon Jun 30, 2014 3:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Jun 30, 2014 3:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 10:46 am
Posts: 2467
Location: Hoboken, NJ
Despite the setbacks, still looking quite nice.

_________________
We like our history sanitized and theme-parked and self-congratulatory, not bloody and angry and unflattering. - Jonathan Yardley


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Jun 30, 2014 8:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 1:57 pm
Posts: 1298
Location: Schodack Landing, NY
Dan K wrote:
It’s been a while. I knew I had been derailed but I did not realize it’s been two months since the last posting. Basically, vacation, a nasty respiratory virus, life, etc all conspired to interrupt my focus, progress, and continuity. I am only now starting to resume the build. This model has no chance of making this year’s NATS now, unfortunately.


So sorry not to see the World Cup on the list of excuses.


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Jul 01, 2014 4:18 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 10:56 am
Posts: 8833
Location: New York City
World Cup commenced after my travails.

I switched tacks again to concentrate on finishing the basics of the main deck. I sprayed some white paint down and taped off what will be safety lanes.

BTW, if I hadn't mentioned it before, the main deck fit is terrible. Plenty of sanding is required to get it to fit flush into the provided channels. Plus, there are guides molded into the underside of the deck that are supposed to align with the tops of two internal guides that hold down the waterline weight. At least one side has to be cut away in oder to allow the deck to lie flat without interference from these "bulkheads".


Attachments:
DSCN6915small.jpg
DSCN6915small.jpg [ 67.52 KiB | Viewed 1572 times ]
DSCN6914small.jpg
DSCN6914small.jpg [ 48.72 KiB | Viewed 1572 times ]
DSCN6908small.jpg
DSCN6908small.jpg [ 93.5 KiB | Viewed 1572 times ]


Last edited by Dan K on Thu Jul 03, 2014 12:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Jul 01, 2014 10:11 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 5:16 pm
Posts: 821
Location: Wisconsin
Very nice. We are getting close. Any chance of VB?


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jul 02, 2014 10:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 5:36 pm
Posts: 2160
Location: About 50 miles away from the Gulf of Mexico ( traveling W is you do so :)
Good to have you back Dan :thumbs_up_1:



Jose :wave_1:


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Jul 07, 2014 3:59 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 10:56 am
Posts: 8833
Location: New York City
Thx. Sadly, no chance of this showing at VB.

I completed and painted the basic main deck over the weekend. Not bad, some touch-ups required. In retrospect, I probably should have used light grey instead of a stark white for the safety lane lines. I can do so for Kyokuto Maru. Perhaps the lines could be thinner as well but I used the thinnest Micron tape I could find at 0.4mm. I suspect that as I add ladders, piping and equipment to the deck, the lines will fade in prominence.

The deck color is still bit of an open question for the Japanese wartime merchants. Many ships, tankers included, used a sort of red-orange color (anti-rust?) paint in pre-war days. Not all retained it; there is plenty of anecdotal evidence that many decks were painted over with grey. I turned to Motoyuki-san for his advice, which was that the evidence is inconclusive, and he suggested sticking with grey to play it safe. Which I did.

I choose a dark grey for the deck, and neutral grey for everything else, again, a Motoyuki-san suggestion.


Attachments:
DSCN6926small.jpg
DSCN6926small.jpg [ 98.21 KiB | Viewed 1452 times ]
DSCN6924small.jpg
DSCN6924small.jpg [ 152.71 KiB | Viewed 1452 times ]
DSCN6923small.jpg
DSCN6923small.jpg [ 136.7 KiB | Viewed 1452 times ]
Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Jul 08, 2014 10:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 5:36 pm
Posts: 2160
Location: About 50 miles away from the Gulf of Mexico ( traveling W is you do so :)
Nice job with the deck :thumbs_up_1: :thumbs_up_1: How many tons of oil did these tankers carry?




Jose :wave_1:


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Jul 08, 2014 2:50 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 10:56 am
Posts: 8833
Location: New York City
I'm not sure about tonnage capacity. The Wikipedia entry lists approx 16,100 cubic meters storage capacity for Kyokuto and Toa Maru, 14,600 cubic meters capacity for Nippon Maru.


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2014 3:10 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 10:56 am
Posts: 8833
Location: New York City
The USN Wartime Recognition Guide states ranges of 93,000 to 103,000 barrels of oil storage for various members of the class.

I decided to work on the bow next. Most of the UNREP conversions included a port side, bow mounted sponson in addition to the stern sponson, to guide & clear oil hoses for refueling ahead. Unlike the stern, this sponson was fully enclosed by plating, with a fully rounded leading edge. The outer edge plate served as an guide. Some examples shown below (Teiyo Maru is a proto-Kawasaki type, but shows off the sponson leading edge very nicely.)


Attachments:
Shinkoku Maru enroute to PH, 12-1-41 small.jpg
Shinkoku Maru enroute to PH, 12-1-41 small.jpg [ 145.93 KiB | Viewed 1330 times ]
Kokuyo Maru , Rabaul 11- 1943 crop.jpg
Kokuyo Maru , Rabaul 11- 1943 crop.jpg [ 141.56 KiB | Viewed 1330 times ]
Kokuyo Maru , Rabaul 11- 1943  bow crop enlarged.jpg
Kokuyo Maru , Rabaul 11- 1943 bow crop enlarged.jpg [ 51.37 KiB | Viewed 1330 times ]
Teiyo Maru refueling Kiso, May 1943, Paramushiro Strait,  Marumag#66 small.jpg
Teiyo Maru refueling Kiso, May 1943, Paramushiro Strait, Marumag#66 small.jpg [ 70.76 KiB | Viewed 1330 times ]
Itsukushima Maru sinking #2 via VPB-115-MARUDU_BAY-N_BORNEO-31-10-1944-4  bow crop.jpg
Itsukushima Maru sinking #2 via VPB-115-MARUDU_BAY-N_BORNEO-31-10-1944-4 bow crop.jpg [ 30.76 KiB | Viewed 1330 times ]
Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2014 3:11 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 10:56 am
Posts: 8833
Location: New York City
Interestingly, Kyokuto Maru, and probably her Group 1 sister, Toa Maru, did not have this forward UNREP sponson. Looking at the photo of her refueling Hiei on page 4 of this thread, or in the photo her refueling Hiryu below, it seems as if a portion of her port side forecastle bulwarks is either removable or, hinged to pivot back aft, so as to allow refueling hoses to be passed forward.


Attachments:
Kyokuto Maru refueling Hiryu, April 1942 small.jpg
Kyokuto Maru refueling Hiryu, April 1942 small.jpg [ 155.38 KiB | Viewed 1331 times ]
Kyokuto Maru refueling Hiryu, April 1942 crop.jpg
Kyokuto Maru refueling Hiryu, April 1942 crop.jpg [ 76.49 KiB | Viewed 1331 times ]
Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2014 3:15 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 10:56 am
Posts: 8833
Location: New York City
Sizing wise, the Fujimi kit part is far too small, by at least half, and only for a platform instead of a full sponson. For Kenyo Maru, I just used styrene round and sheet to form the sponson, along with a little putty.

The kit molded hawse pipe coamings are misshapen. I removed those and scratch built new ones. I tried to use a heated metal point to allow the plastic to form into a round ridge around the entry point but, it
didn't work out. This approach has worked in the past but, I've lost or misplaced the original tool that I'd used back then. So, I had to round off the end of the smallest styrene rod with a hollow running through it that I had, then slice off the ends and glue those on. These may be slightly imperfect. I'll try to even it up. I do know that when covered with paint and partially obscured by an anchor, it will be hard to notice any imperfection.


Attachments:
DSCN6950 small.jpg
DSCN6950 small.jpg [ 91.09 KiB | Viewed 1331 times ]
DSCN6944small.jpg
DSCN6944small.jpg [ 82.14 KiB | Viewed 1331 times ]
DSCN6948small.jpg
DSCN6948small.jpg [ 99.71 KiB | Viewed 1331 times ]
DSCN6953small.jpg
DSCN6953small.jpg [ 64.8 KiB | Viewed 1331 times ]
Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2014 7:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 1:40 pm
Posts: 8349
Location: New Jersey
Really fine work! These are going to look so good when they are finished. MosquitoCon is in 7 1/2 months!

_________________
Martin

"Tomorrow is the most important thing in life. Comes into us at midnight very clean. It's perfect when it arrives and it puts itself in our hands. It hopes we've learned something from yesterday." John Wayne

Ship Model Gallery


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jul 23, 2014 3:38 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 10:56 am
Posts: 8833
Location: New York City
Gee, at this rate, it will done for MosquitoCon 2016

I completed the painting of the horizontal portions of the forecastle and aft decks with dark grey. Some vertical surfaces have gotten coats of neutral gray; others have yet to. Nothing is glued in place aside from the aft deck. Some horizontal surfaces have already been taped in preparation for applications of paint to the vertical surfaces.


Attachments:
DSCN6968 small.jpg
DSCN6968 small.jpg [ 134.65 KiB | Viewed 1273 times ]
Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jul 23, 2014 4:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 5:36 pm
Posts: 2160
Location: About 50 miles away from the Gulf of Mexico ( traveling W is you do so :)
Dan K wrote:
The USN Wartime Recognition Guide states ranges of 93,000 to 103,000 barrels of oil storage for various members of the class..)


Did you see anything in tonnage #s i just want to see how well they did next to the American counterparts, although i think a little over 100k barrels left alot to be desired. Great looking tankers though, but to be honest being on an oil tanker was the last place i'd like to be on at that time.



Jose :wave_1:


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Jul 24, 2014 1:41 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 10:56 am
Posts: 8833
Location: New York City
Jose, nothing is listed in tons. However, I know that there are several different conversion calculations available, depending on how you define ton; say, displacement vs. freight. It depends on exactly what sort of measure you want. I'm sure there are board members far better versed in this than I.

A partial explanation from Wiki (fyi - long ton = 2240lbs.):

"The displacement, essentially the weight, of a ship is traditionally expressed in long tons. To simplify measurement it is determined by measuring the volume, rather than weight, of water displaced, and calculating the weight from the volume and density.[12] For practical purposes the displacement ton (DT) is a unit of volume, 35 cubic feet (0.9911 m3), the approximate volume occupied by one ton of seawater (the actual volume varies with salinity and temperature).[13] It is slightly less than the 224 imperial gallons (1.018 m3) of the water ton (based on distilled water).

One measurement ton or freight ton is equal to 40 cubic feet (1.133 m3), but historically it has had several informal definitions. It is sometimes abbreviated as "MTON".[14][15][16][17] The freight ton represents the volume of a truck, train or other freight carrier. In the past it has been used for a cargo ship but the register ton is now preferred. It is correctly abbreviated as "FT"[citation needed] but some users are now using freight ton to represent a weight of 1 tonne (1,000 kg; 2,205 lb), thus the more common abbreviations are now M/T, MT, or MTON (for measurement ton), which still cause it to be confused with the tonne, or even the megatonne.

The register ton is a unit of volume used for the cargo capacity of a ship, defined as 100 cubic feet (2.832 m3). It is often abbreviated RT or GRT for gross registered ton (The former providing confusion with the refrigeration ton). It is known as a tonneau de mer in Belgium, but, in France, a tonneau de mer is 1.44 cubic metres (50.85 cu ft).

The Panama Canal/Universal Measurement System (PC/UMS) is based on net tonnage, modified for Panama Canal billing purposes. PC/UMS is based on a mathematical formula to calculate a vessel's total volume; a PC/UMS net ton is equivalent to 100 cubic feet of capacity.[18]

The water ton is used chiefly in Great Britain, in statistics dealing with petroleum products, and is defined as 224 imperial gallons (35.96 cu ft; 1.018 m3),[19] the volume occupied by 1 long ton (2,240 lb; 1,016 kg) of water under the conditions that define the imperial gallon."


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 359 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 18  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Lars_Bef and 12 guests


You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group