The Ship Model Forum

The Ship Modelers Source
It is currently Mon Jun 23, 2025 11:19 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 274 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2018 11:51 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 10:50 am
Posts: 70
How about this one, from a pilot's album I own?

Image

Seems to show two-tone midships to me.

And from the national markings on the Swordfish, taken before October 1940 for sure


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2018 3:00 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 1:51 pm
Posts: 2874
That would change matters indeed!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2018 9:05 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 7:53 pm
Posts: 446
I hope this works:

https://www.iwm.org.uk/collections/item ... /205185500

https://www.iwm.org.uk/collections/item ... /205140450

IWM allows you to zoom in. It had to be in the middle of a paint job. Looks like a darker shade of grey was being painted on and the island was also a darker grey. You can clearly see lines and patches where the paint is being applied in various sections.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2018 11:03 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 10:50 am
Posts: 70
Notice the difference in Ark Royal between the photo I posted and the first IWM photo. The latter shows the port midship pom poms in place (the one I posted does not) and in the IWM photo the rear of the island has a solid vertical panel at deck level, whereas in the photo I posted it is still open (I believe altered at Liverpool in October 1940). So on the basis of these photos, it would seem that Ark Royal carried a two tone hull scheme during two periods: in November 1941 and also sometime between June and October 1940.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2018 11:31 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2015 9:25 am
Posts: 2269
Location: Los Angeles and Houston
Sutho wrote:
I hope this works:

https://www.iwm.org.uk/collections/item ... /205185500

https://www.iwm.org.uk/collections/item ... /205140450

IWM allows you to zoom in. It had to be in the middle of a paint job. Looks like a darker shade of grey was being painted on and the island was also a darker grey. You can clearly see lines and patches where the paint is being applied in various sections.



What is that white blob to the right of the Destroyer in the second photo?

It looks like an explosion just to the aft of the Destroyer.

MB

_________________
OMG LOOK! A signature

Working on:


1/700 (All Fall 1942):
HIJMS Nagara
HIJMS Aoba & Kinugasa
USS San Francisco
USS Helena
USS St. Louis
USS Laffey & Farenholt
HIJMS Sub-Chasers No. 4 - 7
HIJMS Sub-Chasers No. 13 - 16


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2018 5:25 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 7:53 pm
Posts: 446
MatthewB wrote:
Sutho wrote:
I hope this works:

https://www.iwm.org.uk/collections/item ... /205185500

https://www.iwm.org.uk/collections/item ... /205140450

IWM allows you to zoom in. It had to be in the middle of a paint job. Looks like a darker shade of grey was being painted on and the island was also a darker grey. You can clearly see lines and patches where the paint is being applied in various sections.



What is that white blob to the right of the Destroyer in the second photo?

It looks like an explosion just to the aft of the Destroyer.

MB


Probably an aircraft dropping a depth charge hunting for the U-Boat that torpedoed the Ark Royal.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2018 7:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2008 9:27 am
Posts: 849
Location: Kingston, Jamaica
Hi folks,

Not sure if this has been noticed (if it has, my apologies) but the island in the "two colour" photos is the same darker colour as the lower hull. If the appearance was shadow-generated this would not be so.

Sutho wrote:
Looking at the history of the ship being based at Scapa Flow and also in Gibraltar there two locations it would have been possibly painted differently. The big question that arises now is when and where was the ship painted and for how long.


The ship's chronology states she was at Gibraltar undergoing "self maintenance" during the week or so prior to leaving on her last mission. I suspect the Ark was indeed having a paint job done during that week. It may not have been completed before she sailed.

She was at sea for 3 days before being torpedoed, mainly steaming at a very modest speed because of some heavy weather, so maybe that explains the lack of wear on the lower hull?? :scratch:

http://www.naval-history.net/xGM-Chrono ... 0Royal.htm

Paul

_________________
Hard a starboard.......Shoot!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Apr 22, 2018 1:54 am 
Online
SovereignHobbies
SovereignHobbies

Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2015 9:09 am
Posts: 1191
Location: Aberdeenshire, Scotland, UK
iangazeley wrote:
How about this one, from a pilot's album I own?

Image

Seems to show two-tone midships to me.

And from the national markings on the Swordfish, taken before October 1940 for sure


Indeed that changes much! Thank you for posting! :thumbs_up_1:

_________________
James Duff
Sovereign Hobbies Ltd
http://www.sovereignhobbies.co.uk

Current build:
HMS Imperial D09 1/350
http://www.shipmodels.info/mws_forum/viewtopic.php?f=59&t=167151


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Jul 08, 2018 7:50 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2014 9:02 pm
Posts: 145
Thank you Ian for the wonderful photo.

In both that pic and the first IWM linked pic, I can see the darker colour being painted above the forward knuckle. That rules out shading.

So what we seem to have is an original lighter grey (507C?) being painted over with a darker grey (507A?) which is continually weathering off to reveal the lighter colour, and the ship's crew repainting nearer the waterline and island as they get the chance in the darker colour.

Can I confirm the darker grey on the lower hull is 507A? Any chance it could be 507B?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Jul 14, 2018 2:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2008 3:35 pm
Posts: 2834
Location: UK
Perhaps the lighter grey was hurriedly painted over the Home Fleet dark grey (leaving the lower hull in the darker colour as per HMS Legion in the photos) and it has weathered badly, revealing the Home Fleet scheme underneath?

_________________
In 1757 Admiral John Byng was shot "pour encourager les autres". Voltaire


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2018 2:14 pm 
Online
SovereignHobbies
SovereignHobbies

Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2015 9:09 am
Posts: 1191
Location: Aberdeenshire, Scotland, UK
Jack G wrote:
Thank you Ian for the wonderful photo.

In both that pic and the first IWM linked pic, I can see the darker colour being painted above the forward knuckle. That rules out shading.

So what we seem to have is an original lighter grey (507C?) being painted over with a darker grey (507A?) which is continually weathering off to reveal the lighter colour, and the ship's crew repainting nearer the waterline and island as they get the chance in the darker colour.

Can I confirm the darker grey on the lower hull is 507A? Any chance it could be 507B?


507A = 507B in colour and by this time enamel use had been ordered discontinued for about a year so it's highly unlikely to have been the 507B formulation of Home Fleet Grey.

Given how light the book topping and flight deck appear in this image, I'd still plump for 507C and 507A here.

_________________
James Duff
Sovereign Hobbies Ltd
http://www.sovereignhobbies.co.uk

Current build:
HMS Imperial D09 1/350
http://www.shipmodels.info/mws_forum/viewtopic.php?f=59&t=167151


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Sep 24, 2018 1:49 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2014 9:02 pm
Posts: 145
Thank you James, that is what I will do on my 1/700 model and if all goes well, the 1/350. Modelling that level of weathering is going to be interesting.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Nov 26, 2018 2:36 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2017 11:02 am
Posts: 9
Hello guys!
I'm now building a model of HMS Ark Royal (the one by Merit in 1/350).
The questions are:
1. How can I improve this kit in order to achieve smth really close to what did she look like during the chase of Bismark?
2. Does anybody know, of what types of planes and of what squadrons (numbers, possibly) did Ark's airwing consist at that time (May 26, 1941)?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Nov 26, 2018 3:11 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:02 am
Posts: 10569
Location: EG48
MagisterMan wrote:
smth


??

_________________
Tracy White -Researcher@Large

"Let the evidence guide the research. Do not have a preconceived agenda which will only distort the result."
-Barbara Tuchman


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Nov 26, 2018 3:19 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 11:33 am
Posts: 435
ARK's squadrons during the BISMARCK chase were 810, 818 and 820 (Swordfish) and 808 (Fulmar).


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Nov 26, 2018 4:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 6:00 pm
Posts: 12326
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Tracy White wrote:
MagisterMan wrote:
smth


??

Something.

_________________
De quoi s'agit-il?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Nov 26, 2018 4:22 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:02 am
Posts: 10569
Location: EG48
Timmy C wrote:
Something.


:thumbs_up_1: Thanks. Not hip to the lingo the cool kids use these days. :big_grin:

_________________
Tracy White -Researcher@Large

"Let the evidence guide the research. Do not have a preconceived agenda which will only distort the result."
-Barbara Tuchman


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Dec 05, 2018 1:23 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2011 10:22 am
Posts: 10
Location: Toronto, Ontario Canada
New user one here, i want to build Ark Royal in a diorama at the time of her sinking in 1/700. I was thinking of HMS Legion alongside and the Ark Royal listing. There seems to be the Aoshima and Trumpeter models, which look to be nice models but waterline only and with the images i have seen would not work so well. However I’ve seen rumours of a new Trumpeter model that would be full hull. Is this just a rumour or has anyone heard if Trumpeter are doing this...
Ray


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Dec 06, 2018 12:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 6:14 am
Posts: 238
Location: SE Michigan
rayb wrote:
New user one here, i want to build Ark Royal in a diorama at the time of her sinking in 1/700. I was thinking of HMS Legion alongside and the Ark Royal listing. There seems to be the Aoshima and Trumpeter models, which look to be nice models but waterline only and with the images i have seen would not work so well. However I’ve seen rumours of a new Trumpeter model that would be full hull. Is this just a rumour or has anyone heard if Trumpeter are doing this...
Ray


Not sure if Trumpeter is going to make a full hull, but I have the Trumpeter and Aoshima kits, I like the Trumpeter more. It’s quarterdeck and foredeck are open and the quarterdeck bulkheads are nice, so if you’re building the listing Ark Royal they are more visible. The list isn’t so severe that a full full is required.you can use sheet plastic strip and follow the hull line. The hull is showing in the photos isn’t curved too much. Unless of course you’re building her as she’s capsizing.

_________________
Our CO prior to flying to the boomer: “Our goals on this patrol is to shoot missiles and torpedoes.”
Junior Nuke Officer (me) : “Captain, don’t we really want to be like Monty Python and ‘Not be seen’?”
CO “You seem to be missing the big picture”
“Oh”


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2019 6:09 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2015 11:59 am
Posts: 146
Can anyone tell me what the max Beam was for HMS Ark Royal at the water line ?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 274 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests


You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group