Calling all Royal Navy A-I class fans
Moderators: BB62vet, MartinJQuinn, Timmy C, Gernot, Olaf Held, Dan K, HMAS, ModelMonkey
-
dick
- Posts: 679
- Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 1:44 pm
- Location: UK
Re: 1940 RN destroyer camo & fit info requested!
So would I. Where/by whom was the idea of a camouflage pattern on Glowworm first suggested?
- Laurence Batchelor
- Posts: 1376
- Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 6:20 am
- Location: Warwickshire, England
Re: 1940 RN destroyer camo & fit info requested!
The first I have seen is this new camouflage artwork in Seaforth's Shipcraft AtoI & Tribal class book attributed to a George Richardson.
LB
LB
-
dick
- Posts: 679
- Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 1:44 pm
- Location: UK
Re: 1940 RN destroyer camo & fit info requested!
Ah, well we need hard evidence to support that particular piece of artwork.
Best wishes.
Best wishes.
Last edited by dick on Sun Dec 20, 2009 3:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Quincy
- Posts: 2217
- Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 9:41 am
- Location: Monson, MA.
Re: Calling all Royal Navy A-I class fans
Great pic of the Glowworm Dick.
Thank you for sharing it with us.
Bob Pink.
Bob Pink.
-
mike mccabe
- Starling Models

- Posts: 781
- Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 4:48 pm
- Location: North Wales
- Contact:
Re: Calling all Royal Navy A-I class fans
Yes a nice photo, totally inconclusive in terms of a camouflage scheme for anyone with two or even one partially functioning eye in a head of course for obvious reasons.
Mike
Mike
-
dick
- Posts: 679
- Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 1:44 pm
- Location: UK
Re: Calling all Royal Navy A-I class fans
Laurence,
Thinking further about it.
Referring to the illustration on page 44 you wrote:
"I'd be interested to see where this 'evidence' for Glowworm in camouflage is.
Is it implied she wore it only in the winter of 1939/40 and then repainted? "
According to ar's book some G's wore a patterned camouflage at that time. Given her TROM, the opportunity for Glowworm to repaint out of a patterned scheme prior to the Norwegian Campaign would have been during her period under repair 25th February - 20th March 1940. Having been in a collision resulting is serious structural damage a repaint would be likely.
Mike,
Sorry, you've lost me there old boy. What am I missing?
Cheers
Thinking further about it.
Referring to the illustration on page 44 you wrote:
"I'd be interested to see where this 'evidence' for Glowworm in camouflage is.
Is it implied she wore it only in the winter of 1939/40 and then repainted? "
According to ar's book some G's wore a patterned camouflage at that time. Given her TROM, the opportunity for Glowworm to repaint out of a patterned scheme prior to the Norwegian Campaign would have been during her period under repair 25th February - 20th March 1940. Having been in a collision resulting is serious structural damage a repaint would be likely.
Mike,
Sorry, you've lost me there old boy. What am I missing?
Cheers
- Rob
- Posts: 1067
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 10:08 am
- Location: Cornwall
- Contact:
Re: 1940 RN destroyer camo & fit info requested!
Yup, it's a Cricket class coastal destroyer. With bows intact.MichelB wrote:Laurence, regarding the 'peculiar' photo of Glowworm, I think we're looking at pre-WWI Torpedoboat No 7, with a turtleback bow and an 'flying' gun platform, with tarps covering the sides of the bridge structure. Jane's lists her as Thornycroft Torpedoboat no 7, originally called Glow-worm. Built 1906.
Rob
IPMS Fine Waterline Special Interest Group
-
phil gollin
- Posts: 558
- Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 7:52 am
Re: Calling all Royal Navy A-I class fans
I recently acquired from Evil-Bay a linen print of an HMS Excellent "Instructional Diagram" dated 28/10/1935 entitled "Outline of "Defender Class" showing Lay Out of Fire Control Installation and Communications".
This merely shows diagramatically the position of gunnery instruments and telephones and voice tubes, etc.....
The interesting thing is that it shows a 3" H.A. gun on the platform between the funnels, with the quadruple Vickers 0.5" guns either side of the bridge in line with the DCT and on the same level as "B" mount.
It makes no note of it being "proposed", or "theoretical" or anything else.
Does anyone know if any "D"-class destroyer was ever fitted like this or any plans for this ? (I can't find any reference).
Also, it is interesting that when 12-pounder/3-inch AA guns were fitted during WW2 they were fitted in lieu of the rear TT-tubes rather than on the between funnels platform. I presume because of AA arcs. Does anyone have more info ?
.
This merely shows diagramatically the position of gunnery instruments and telephones and voice tubes, etc.....
The interesting thing is that it shows a 3" H.A. gun on the platform between the funnels, with the quadruple Vickers 0.5" guns either side of the bridge in line with the DCT and on the same level as "B" mount.
It makes no note of it being "proposed", or "theoretical" or anything else.
Does anyone know if any "D"-class destroyer was ever fitted like this or any plans for this ? (I can't find any reference).
Also, it is interesting that when 12-pounder/3-inch AA guns were fitted during WW2 they were fitted in lieu of the rear TT-tubes rather than on the between funnels platform. I presume because of AA arcs. Does anyone have more info ?
.
-
dick
- Posts: 679
- Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 1:44 pm
- Location: UK
Re: Calling all Royal Navy A-I class fans
Dear Phil,
I think you will find that is essentially how they were ...although some may have had a 2 pdr either side of the bridge to start with at least eg Daring. I have not researched this aspect of this class in any detail.
Here is Defender sinking with guns as you describe...
Best wishes
I think you will find that is essentially how they were ...although some may have had a 2 pdr either side of the bridge to start with at least eg Daring. I have not researched this aspect of this class in any detail.
Here is Defender sinking with guns as you describe...
Best wishes
Last edited by dick on Fri Jul 10, 2009 1:44 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
phil gollin
- Posts: 558
- Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 7:52 am
Re: Calling all Royal Navy A-I class fans
I'm going to go and get my eyes tested.
Thanks.
.
Thanks.
.
- Filipe Ramires
- Posts: 1185
- Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 5:56 pm
- Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Re: Calling all Royal Navy A-I class fans
You can see both the Quad Vickers on the bridge and the 3'' between the funnels. Curious feature this last one taking into account the limited arcs of fire for the gun.
-
dick
- Posts: 679
- Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 1:44 pm
- Location: UK
Re: Calling all Royal Navy A-I class fans
Here is a picture of Daring. Gun between funnels is clearer to see and it looks to me like a single 2pdr beside the bridge.
- Secondo
- Posts: 1246
- Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2008 6:24 am
- Location: Saint-Andiol, France
Re: Calling all Royal Navy A-I class fans
Personally, I have a crack for Is, and in my wish list there's a 1/100 or 1/200 HMS Ithuriel (that's the name I like most, given my passion for John Milton
Could somebody tell me if, when Ithuriel was commissioned, she was in the same configuration of the other Is?

-
dick
- Posts: 679
- Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 1:44 pm
- Location: UK
- Quincy
- Posts: 2217
- Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 9:41 am
- Location: Monson, MA.
Re: Calling all Royal Navy A-I class fans
Hi Dick:
Thanks for the link.
Bob Pink.
Thanks for the link.
Bob Pink.
- Secondo
- Posts: 1246
- Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2008 6:24 am
- Location: Saint-Andiol, France
Re: Calling all Royal Navy A-I class fans
Thank youdick wrote:http://www.the-blueprints.com/blueprints/ships/destroyers-uk/14932/
This is the photo to which I referred; is it possible that the camouflage scheme was specular on both sides?
http://img187.imageshack.us/img187/1197 ... 003ch5.jpg

-
dick
- Posts: 679
- Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 1:44 pm
- Location: UK
Re: Calling all Royal Navy A-I class fans
Secundo,
The link to your photo seems to be broken/wrong?
Can you try posting your photo here (at the "Upload attachment" tab below).
Best wishes
The link to your photo seems to be broken/wrong?
Can you try posting your photo here (at the "Upload attachment" tab below).
Best wishes
- Secondo
- Posts: 1246
- Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2008 6:24 am
- Location: Saint-Andiol, France
Re: Calling all Royal Navy A-I class fans
The caption doesn't specify when this photo was taken, but I suppose it might have been near the end of her career, as she bears the two-tone camouflage

-
dick
- Posts: 679
- Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 1:44 pm
- Location: UK
Re: Calling all Royal Navy A-I class fans
Here is the only other picture of Ithuriel that I have found.
Alan Raven in his RN camouflage Vol 2 says (page 5) that this is a three colour scheme of MS2, MS4 & MS4a. If you look closely at your picture you can see three tones on the hull. His book shows a drawing of the starboard camouflage as a mirror image of this pattern on the port side.
Cheers
Alan Raven in his RN camouflage Vol 2 says (page 5) that this is a three colour scheme of MS2, MS4 & MS4a. If you look closely at your picture you can see three tones on the hull. His book shows a drawing of the starboard camouflage as a mirror image of this pattern on the port side.
Cheers
-
ar
Re: Calling all Royal Navy A-I class fans
The two photos shown were taken in October 42 upon completion of repairs.
The ship commissioned in a different configeration; that is, with slightly taller funnels and a mainmast of some height. Was also painted in what appears to be an Alexandria type camouflage.
A little later, the ship had a refit; funnels cut down and an Admiralty camouflage pattern applied.
Upon repairs in October, a different (second) Admiralty camouflage painted up as shown in the views posted.
The ship commissioned in a different configeration; that is, with slightly taller funnels and a mainmast of some height. Was also painted in what appears to be an Alexandria type camouflage.
A little later, the ship had a refit; funnels cut down and an Admiralty camouflage pattern applied.
Upon repairs in October, a different (second) Admiralty camouflage painted up as shown in the views posted.
dick wrote:Here is the only other picture of Ithuriel that I have found.
Alan Raven in his RN camouflage Vol 2 says (page 5) that this is a three colour scheme of MS2, MS4 & MS4a. If you look closely at your picture you can see three tones on the hull. His book shows a drawing of the starboard camouflage as a mirror image of this pattern on the port side.
Cheers