Lenght and width of the ship...ASFC wrote:Melbourne was a Majestic Class Carrier-not quite sure what the differences are yet!
I thought colussus class =bigger...
And the improved hangar space..
Mitch
Moderators: BB62vet, MartinJQuinn, JIM BAUMANN, Jon, Dan K
Lenght and width of the ship...ASFC wrote:Melbourne was a Majestic Class Carrier-not quite sure what the differences are yet!
They will.kidcurrie42 wrote:Hiya Mitch,
Do you really think that the Netherlands will have a Carrier, i had the impression that manpower was a problem in the Netherlands Navy as it is in the Royal Navy ? Den Helder would be the only option for a base, last time i was there i found a cool model shop just outside the base, they had the 1/350 Kortenaer and Karel Doorman Frigates.
John

OMG yes indeed, i was on Iowa when she did a demo, and we was in the Launch area with Missouri and Wisconsin, we went to action stations prior to commencement of Desert Storm, i was lucky and was Off watch, so my off watch place was on the upperdeck, OMG you should have seen that sky light up man, one minute it was pitch black and then it was July 4th, Later on the B-52's flew over like big ghostly figures,Hippy Ed wrote:John, I have seen the New Jersey back in 1983 when she was retrofitted with the Tomahawks. Watched the firing and she even blasted her 16 inchers which was quite a sight to see (& experience!) I was out on the Channel Islands off So. Cal which is near the Test range for PT. Mugu. I'd love to see her done in that configuration
Now that'd be an experience!!kidcurrie42 wrote:OMG yes indeed, i was on Iowa when she did a demo, and we was in the Launch area with Missouri and Wisconsin, we went to action stations prior to commencement of Desert Storm, i was lucky and was Off watch, so my off watch place was on the upperdeck, OMG you should have seen that sky light up man, one minute it was pitch black and then it was July 4th, Later on the B-52's flew over like big ghostly figures,Hippy Ed wrote:John, I have seen the New Jersey back in 1983 when she was retrofitted with the Tomahawks. Watched the firing and she even blasted her 16 inchers which was quite a sight to see (& experience!) I was out on the Channel Islands off So. Cal which is near the Test range for PT. Mugu. I'd love to see her done in that configuration
I may do all 4 in 80/90's fit and do NJ separate later.
They do have the protection fleet...ASFC wrote:Oh forgot to add on the Dutch 'Carrier' question-the Dutch Navy does NOT have the escorts required to protect any Carrier, and all the other big ticket items that they have.
If the Dutch ever get a Carrier, it will be 20 years before they have rebuilt their fleet enough to operate it and protect it.
I'll stop flogging the dead horse now!
Just done my maths and i work it out to be Eagle/Ark Royal kit would need a 4.5cm section removed from length and 1.4 from beam, that will leave you a carrier approx 30.5cm(12") in length, makes you realise just how small a ship that those pilots had to land on in them Skooters and such like.ASFC wrote:Aye, she be scratchbuild, although I am having a look at the Plastic British Carrier kits out there to see if any are worth buying to kit bash (or to just nick the parts more generally!).

Hi,ASFC wrote:Aye, she be scratchbuild, although I am having a look at the Plastic British Carrier kits out there to see if any are worth buying to kit bash (or to just nick the parts more generally!).

Until they announce that it is just rumours-the only new Frigate your Navy are building are OPVs armed with just Guns and Helicopter for littoral patrol.mitchell300 wrote:ASFC
There are plans of building a new class of frigates and xtra from The ruyter class (if the extra the ruyter class happends i donno)
Depends on the country, 10-20 years-look at Cavour, CVF, look how long 10 Carriers in the US have taken.What ur saying of that where not ready?
Dude how long does it take to build an carrier
Think of that.
4 LCF, 2 (Soon 3) LPDs, 1 AOR, 4 OPVs hell all that remains of your Cold War Navy are your Tripartite Minehunters, and they will need replacing soon. And then you built 8 Frigates and flogged 6 of them for half the price they cost to build. You have replaced most of your navy, spending some serious money, and your Defence Budget is still not at the NATO standard of 2% GDP (that will happen in 2009/10)The navy has not spended alot on new stuff.
They are keeping it until they can build the carrier group
Amsterdam has stil 2 nice ships to put in the carrier group..
Rumours then. Until it is annoucned as being ordered, it isn't happening. Take a look at BAE. They have just designed a new UCAV Carrier. But with no orders it isn't going to get built!I have read this on the dutch navy forum.
Only dutch language
I have speaken several peeps from the navy.
They all say an carrier.
Yes-you had two Cruisers, 12 Destroyers, 8 Submarines and 6 Frigates.Remember the days from karel doorman?
The fleet whas same as now if u go look at the Anti air power.
I must disagree with that-if they are so good at self protection why does the USN and RN build expensive DDG (and CGs in USN) to protect those Carriers. Without Escorts your Carriers are white elephants and sitting duck. Why do you think there is so much worry over the cut in Escorts in the RN? Bcause without Escorts CVF is useless.Btw see the new nimitz class and cvf class from uk and us..
the carriers can almost protect theirself.
No you don't neither the F-16s your Air Force has, nor the F-35As or the Gripens your Air Force is looking at ordering can be used on Carriers. You have 20 Naval Helos-barely enough for the current ships you own.I quess the designers from the new carrier arnt that stupid to NOT put anti air missiles on the carrier
And btw about helicopters and fighters jets..
We have enough.
You have 4 Submarines, not 10. Do some research.About subs?
2 new subs are being made and we have already about 10???
In Den helder we have atm 4 and 1 in dockyard
And break the rules on open Defence budgets? Holland is not China.........And defence budget?
Like i said they have handle some money behind the doors to build new ships in the future..
And they cost money-look at how much the UK/France have spent on CVF designThere are many designs for carriers.
Thats nice an Computer Generated Graphic does not equal a design-btw you still haven't shown me this Dutch design for an Aircraft Carrier.There is actually 1 design..
Cant find it anymore on my pc..
But i really had 1..
I was commenting on the fact that to have an effective Carrier Fleet you need TWO Carriers-notice all the serious Carrier operators around the world have two Carriers or want two carriers at least to make sure they always have 1 available. Thats why the French what a second one, why the Spanish and Italians built a second one, and why India are building multiple new Carriers.''-Availability problems-would Holland politicans be willing to fund a navy big enough for two Carriers''
Ehm?? 2 carriers?
It will be 1.
Why, are you worried you have lost the argument. This is a Carrier thread. Ok it is picture Post but its nice to actually talk about Carriers.Ok back to topic![]()
None of them are Carriers. And Holland Has NOT ordered Sigma-Sigma has been ordered by Morocco and Indonesia.BIG EDIT FOUND THE WESITE WHIT PICS AGAIN!
http://www.scheldeshipbuilding.com/enforcer/
http://www.scheldeshipbuilding.com/Sigma.htm