by Dan K » Mon Dec 08, 2025 4:54 pm
I usually enjoy writing up a review, but this one was a bit of a shock, particularly as it came right on the heels of the Mutsuki kit which, outside of the plating (and my sample hull), is an excellent kit.
I'm not the first one to point out errors with this kit, but the sheer number of them really took me by surprise.
Word on the street is that Triumph acknowledged the criticisms and plans to improve its research. Whether or not that might mean a corrected and re-issued Akizuki is unknown at this time.
Granted, this pic of the imminent Triumph 1/350 Shiratsuyu class kit release is a marketing shot that I grabbed off the net, but it does seem like the hull plating is toned down. No word yet on whether or not we'll get a review sample.
- Attachments
-

I usually enjoy writing up a review, but this one was a bit of a shock, particularly as it came right on the heels of the Mutsuki kit which, outside of the plating (and my sample hull), is an excellent kit.
I'm not the first one to point out errors with this kit, but the sheer number of them really took me by surprise.
Word on the street is that Triumph acknowledged the criticisms and plans to improve its research. Whether or not that might mean a corrected and re-issued Akizuki is unknown at this time.
Granted, this pic of the imminent Triumph 1/350 Shiratsuyu class kit release is a marketing shot that I grabbed off the net, but it does seem like the hull plating is toned down. No word yet on whether or not we'll get a review sample.