The Ship Model Forum

The Ship Modelers Source
It is currently Fri Apr 18, 2025 7:44 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1153 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 54, 55, 56, 57, 58
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Jan 19, 2025 12:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 7:59 am
Posts: 239
You can purchase them from the RMG Picture Library:

https://images.rmg.co.uk/search/?searchQuery=M3142
https://images.rmg.co.uk/search/?searchQuery=M3143
https://images.rmg.co.uk/search/?searchQuery=M3144

_________________
King George V class Battleships in 3D


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Jan 20, 2025 11:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2008 12:44 pm
Posts: 1813
Location: Herk-de-Stad, Belgium
You can download reduced resolution images from those links. If you only need to have an indication where the plates are situated, that might be sufficient for your purpose. If you however need the exact dimensions related to the frame nrs, then you'll have to order the full size prints - but it'll be quite costly!

I have ordered those prints from the Hood and the Nelson, many years ago. The prices have increased since then - of course!

_________________
"I've heard there's a wicked war a-blazing, and the taste of war I know so very well
Even now I see the foreign flag a-raising, their guns on fire as we sail into hell"
Roger Whittaker +9/13/2023


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jan 22, 2025 11:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 6:17 am
Posts: 409
Location: Lerici
i paid for this very set of plans 170 pounds in 2022. They are really beautiful, even with the position and size of every single bolt and rivet.
Expensive but really good. the images are high resolution .tiff, perfectly scanned and registered.

_________________
On the bench: evolution of Royal Italian Navy Ironclads-1/700

-Regia Nave Roma...no, not that one!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Feb 08, 2025 7:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 7:59 am
Posts: 239
I've just finished reading King George V-class Battleships by Daniel Knowles. A decent read, but one passage in particular caught my attention. In an account of the conditions faced by Duke of York during the Battle of North Cape, Knowles says this:

Quote:
... the large waves of the following sea made if difficult for the destroyers to keep up with the Duke of York. A number of 20-mm Oerlikon cannon and 40-mm Bofors that had been fitted on the forecastle were ripped off their mounts along with ready-use lockers as the battleship d[r]ove headlong into the waves...

As far as I can remember, this is the first reference I have ever come across to there having been Bofors mounted on the forecastle of any KGV, and in 1943 as well. I've never seen any photographic evidence to support this, or any drawings. Does anyone know of any references that could back this up? Knowles doesn't give a reference for this paragraph.

_________________
King George V class Battleships in 3D


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Feb 10, 2025 10:05 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2021 11:52 am
Posts: 179
Martocticvs,

I have not read the book that you mention, however, despite it being a "decent read," I recommend that you treat the information given with reserve.

I have checked both Raven and Roberts' "British Battleships of World War 2" and Burt's "British Battleships 1919 - 1939."
The former is the best technical record. Burt is also good but tends more to the biographical side of the ships' lives.
Raven and Roberts gives details of the additions/removals of close-range armaments throughout the lives of all of the
KING GEORGE V class. DUKE of YORK did not receive any 40/60 Bofors mountings until the 1944/45 refit prior to going to the Far East when she was given two quadruple mountings.

Concerning weather/self-inflicted (blast) damage suffered off the North Cape: Burt contains what I take to be an extract from the ship's Report post the action. It is worth reading.

Hope that this is useful.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Feb 11, 2025 5:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2008 12:44 pm
Posts: 1813
Location: Herk-de-Stad, Belgium
And 40mm Bofors guns on the forecastle seem very unlikely in any ship. You can read the passage even that these were ripped off the accompanying destroyers, and those certainly didn't have any guns on the forecastle, it would be far too impractical.

_________________
"I've heard there's a wicked war a-blazing, and the taste of war I know so very well
Even now I see the foreign flag a-raising, their guns on fire as we sail into hell"
Roger Whittaker +9/13/2023


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Feb 11, 2025 2:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 7:59 am
Posts: 239
Thanks guys. Yes, I was very skeptical of that statement as I know they didn't get Bofors on the forecastle even in 44/45, or post war when the single mounts started appearing. In fact they had a lot of the Oerlikons removed from the forecastle in the 44 refit. The quad mount Bofors were in short supply and I couldn't see them risking them in such an exposed position.

_________________
King George V class Battleships in 3D


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Feb 11, 2025 4:44 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Mar 13, 2024 9:45 am
Posts: 424
Maarten, a number of US battleships had 40mm gun mounts on their forecastle.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Feb 13, 2025 6:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2008 12:44 pm
Posts: 1813
Location: Herk-de-Stad, Belgium
FFG-7 wrote:
Maarten, a number of US battleships had 40mm gun mounts on their forecastle.

Thank you, I didn't know that.

_________________
"I've heard there's a wicked war a-blazing, and the taste of war I know so very well
Even now I see the foreign flag a-raising, their guns on fire as we sail into hell"
Roger Whittaker +9/13/2023


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Feb 14, 2025 5:55 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2021 3:34 am
Posts: 153
Location: Hajdúszoboszló, Hungary
I wonder how accurate this drawing of Duke of York in her 1945 state?
https://www.reddit.com/r/WarshipPorn/co ... /#lightbox

Did she really had this much Quad Pom-Pom-s all around the hull?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Feb 14, 2025 11:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 6:00 pm
Posts: 12304
Location: Ottawa, Canada
TZoli wrote:
I wonder how accurate this drawing of Duke of York in her 1945 state?
https://www.reddit.com/r/WarshipPorn/co ... /#lightbox

Did she really had this much Quad Pom-Pom-s all around the hull?

The two on the stern are seen here: https://www.iwm.org.uk/collections/item ... /205161420
One of the two by Turret B: https://www.iwm.org.uk/collections/item ... /205161490

_________________
De quoi s'agit-il?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Feb 14, 2025 6:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 7:59 am
Posts: 239
Plus one either side on the signal deck extensions: https://www.worldnavalships.com/forums/ ... 846.attach

_________________
King George V class Battleships in 3D


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Feb 16, 2025 3:13 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2021 3:34 am
Posts: 153
Location: Hajdúszoboszló, Hungary
Thanks!
Wonder why not use the Octuple mounts for the added main deck mounts?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1153 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 54, 55, 56, 57, 58

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 43 guests


You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group