The Ship Model Forum

The Ship Modelers Source
It is currently Thu Jul 03, 2025 4:12 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 261 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 14  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Jan 22, 2015 1:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2010 5:00 pm
Posts: 297
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Hey everyone

I'm really new to this forum as a member, long time lurker. I primarily have built aircraft and sci fi (Star Trek) models, so this is my first big part with naval modeling.

I've had the New Jersey for about 4 years now, waiting to be built. In that time I had picked up Eduards photoetch set for it, replacement turned brass barrels from B&D Barrels as well as Pontos Models scale wood deck. Pontos has released a full upgrade set since, which probably includes even more than what I've already purchased, sadly. Good thing I have the Missouri in the stash as well to blow cash on later ;)

Please please please, if you see that I've added something wrong or am using the wrong colors, whatever, point it out so that I can fix it. I have no problem with critiquing something that I can fix!

Thanks!

Brett Matthews

To start, I began removing the ladders from the turret #2

Image

After that, attachment began.

Image

Image

Image



I started next on the barrels....well, one so far. I removed the plastic barrel and drilled out the blast bag to accept the new brass barrel.

Image

And here's where we ended for the day. I will be working on improving the seal between the blast bag and barrel, since it should be flush and no gap. That's for the next work session.

Image

Fast forward another year and a half to last night and here's here I'm at.

PE Assembly
Image

Image

Superstructure coming together
Image

Image

Upper level painted haze grey along with decks painted. Actual progress!

Image

Image

_________________
Brett Matthews


Last edited by Brett M on Thu Jul 13, 2017 3:46 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Jan 22, 2015 4:52 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 3:32 pm
Posts: 84
Location: Dalton City, Illinois
Welcome to the site Brett...you will love it here..you will get all the help you can possibly use, from some real knowledgable people..your work is looking good..keep your updates coming! Doug B


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Jan 22, 2015 5:09 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 1:15 am
Posts: 5060
Looks good! I do see a couple of minor things that could be fixed at this stage: the decking right behind the flag bridge on the 03 level has been plated over with a additional splinter protection to protect the electronics and combat areas below; the area right fwd of the flag bridge fwd windows is not decked over but hollow, with a shielding effect to the large vents located behind. Though he is building an earlier version from Vietnam Era you might check out Hank Strub's build in 1:200. He served on the ship and can answer many questions.

Regards. Tom


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Jan 22, 2015 5:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2010 5:00 pm
Posts: 297
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Fliger747 wrote:
Looks good! I do see a couple of minor things that could be fixed at this stage: the decking right behind the flag bridge on the 03 level has been plated over with a additional splinter protection to protect the electronics and combat areas below; the area right fwd of the flag bridge fwd windows is not decked over but hollow, with a shielding effect to the large vents located behind. Though he is building an earlier version from Vietnam Era you might check out Hank Strub's build in 1:200. He served on the ship and can answer many questions.

Regards. Tom



Thanks for the reply, exactly the info I was looking for. Hopefully I understood you correctly. I had to go find plans for the New Jery since I didn't know deck numbering.....

Are these the two area's you mentioned?

Image

I'll check out the other build you mentioned as well, I'm sure there's a great deal of info there.

Thanks again

Brett

_________________
Brett Matthews


Last edited by Brett M on Thu Jul 13, 2017 3:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Jan 22, 2015 7:43 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 1:15 am
Posts: 5060
Yes hollow fwd and plated, probably. Missouri is, will try to post a couple of photos for you.

Tom


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Jan 22, 2015 7:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 1:15 am
Posts: 5060
Attachment:
01 level_MG_6019.jpg
01 level_MG_6019.jpg [ 160.77 KiB | Viewed 7081 times ]
Attachment:
flag bridge_MG_6149.jpg
flag bridge_MG_6149.jpg [ 180.01 KiB | Viewed 7081 times ]


You can see where the plating ends. The deck and top of the wood are equal, about the thickness equal to that of the wood was added.

On the 01 level you can see this vent shield which is open top and bottom.

Tom


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Jan 22, 2015 8:30 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 1:15 am
Posts: 5060
Checking my fwd stack photos the stack coming rail only has a top rail. I don't think my ship has this correct! I would check current NJ photos on this as every ship has variations.

Cheers: T


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jan 23, 2015 3:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2010 5:00 pm
Posts: 297
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Fliger747 wrote:
Checking my fwd stack photos the stack coming rail only has a top rail. I don't think my ship has this correct! I would check current NJ photos on this as every ship has variations.

Cheers: T



Thanks for both replies. I checked photos and you're absolutely correct on the rails for the forward (and aft) stack. I'll cut out the extras and also work on the other two locations you mentioned. Thanks for your help!.

Brett

_________________
Brett Matthews


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jan 23, 2015 6:34 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 1:15 am
Posts: 5060
It is mildly hilarious that I keep noticing things in my photos researching for others, and finding that I didn't get right. So a ship legitimately 98% complete keeps getting further for completion!

A lot of good info and discussion over on the Calling all ship fans Iowa thread!

Tom


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jan 23, 2015 7:12 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 1:15 am
Posts: 5060
Attachment:
BB 63.jpg
BB 63.jpg [ 164.32 KiB | Viewed 6983 times ]


Brett:

This is my project in 1:192. Always something to add or correct!

Looking fwd to see yours progress.

Regards: Tom


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Jan 25, 2015 3:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2010 5:00 pm
Posts: 297
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Fliger747 wrote:
Attachment:
BB 63.jpg


Brett:

This is my project in 1:192. Always something to add or correct!

Looking fwd to see yours progress.

Regards: Tom



Very good looking ship you're building. That's pretty funny on the 98% bit and finding other things to add :)

Brett

_________________
Brett Matthews


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Jan 25, 2015 3:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2010 5:00 pm
Posts: 297
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Here's where I'm at as of today. I haven't finished the funnel, as I've removing part of the railings, so that's not on yet. Painted all the parts here, painted the deck, railings etc. Trying to figure out how I could add the viewing slits on the front of the tower, sometime today.

Image

Image

Image

I'm glad that these pictures are much bigger than the actual parts. They don't hold up as well on the detail parts!

Brett

_________________
Brett Matthews


Last edited by Brett M on Thu Jul 13, 2017 4:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Jan 25, 2015 7:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 7:32 pm
Posts: 960
Location: Seattle, Wa.
Your progress looks very good.
Looking forward to your next update.

_________________
Gordon


"Then there was one patched-up carrier...."
Vice Admiral Thomas A. Kinkaid


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Jan 25, 2015 8:23 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 1:15 am
Posts: 5060
The quality of the PE you are using looks very good. I have been using Tom's PE and though it has a nice scale to it for ladders and rails, it is far too soft.

A comment about the barrels for the 16" rifles. the muzzles appear to be tapered inward? Perhaps a very minor fill and drill might be in order. Mine aren't nearly so fancy, being made of several overlapping tubes and a bot of filler tapered with sandpaper in a drill motor. All looking very good, photos always make things look worse than the really are!

Problem with my last 1% is I have a lot of photographs of the ship, hundreds, and everytime I see a bulkhead there is something to add such as a loudspeaker, work light, external cabling, brackets and wh0 knows what. It does add a convincing clutter!

Check the extent of the awning over the 08 conning station, the one on Missouri dos not extend beyond the bulwark. Yours is foil?

Regards: Tom


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Jan 27, 2015 5:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2010 5:00 pm
Posts: 297
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Fliger747 wrote:
The quality of the PE you are using looks very good. I have been using Tom's PE and though it has a nice scale to it for ladders and rails, it is far too soft.

A comment about the barrels for the 16" rifles. the muzzles appear to be tapered inward? Perhaps a very minor fill and drill might be in order. Mine aren't nearly so fancy, being made of several overlapping tubes and a bot of filler tapered with sandpaper in a drill motor. All looking very good, photos always make things look worse than the really are!

Problem with my last 1% is I have a lot of photographs of the ship, hundreds, and everytime I see a bulkhead there is something to add such as a loudspeaker, work light, external cabling, brackets and wh0 knows what. It does add a convincing clutter!

Check the extent of the awning over the 08 conning station, the one on Missouri dos not extend beyond the bulwark. Yours is foil?

Regards: Tom



Hey Tom

The PE is all Eduard's stuff, not too bad. The only problem I've had is that they notch where rails bend, which makes the PE very thin and can snap apart pretty easily. My starboard CIWS railing isn't looking so hot due to this. Hopefully port side turns out better.

I'll check out the barrels and see about drilling them if they are tapered.

I keep seeing more and more details that are lacking in the Tamiya kit....makes me wonder how much I can add in 1/350 scale as well haha

The awning is just the Tamiya kit part, it does look a bit low from the front, so it might have slipped while the glue was setting, but I do know it extends past the bulwark, ever so slightly.

Thanks again for the help!

Brett

_________________
Brett Matthews


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jan 28, 2015 2:10 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 1:15 am
Posts: 5060
It is interesting that many modelers group by scale! There are a number of folks on this site building variations of the 1:200 Trumpeter BB61 class. Perhaps this is because scale does specifically affect the level of detail one can add. For the kit builders Choice of aftermarket items can make a big difference, in smaller scales scratch and going beyond the available addons becomes more difficult. The size and expense of the 1:200 kits makes them a very serious project, serious enough that several have gone to great lengths to correct major hull inaccuracies, something probably not as noticeable in the smaller ships.

Keep up the great work and be sure to check out the Iowa section on the CASF area, great info there.

Cheers: Tom


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Feb 17, 2015 11:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2010 5:00 pm
Posts: 297
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Fliger747 wrote:
It is interesting that many modelers group by scale! There are a number of folks on this site building variations of the 1:200 Trumpeter BB61 class. Perhaps this is because scale does specifically affect the level of detail one can add. For the kit builders Choice of aftermarket items can make a big difference, in smaller scales scratch and going beyond the available addons becomes more difficult. The size and expense of the 1:200 kits makes them a very serious project, serious enough that several have gone to great lengths to correct major hull inaccuracies, something probably not as noticeable in the smaller ships.

Keep up the great work and be sure to check out the Iowa section on the CASF area, great info there.

Cheers: Tom



Hey Tom

Yeah, I figured starting with a 1/350 scale was a good compromise between size vs. too small for extra details. I'm not sure how those that model 1/700 scale ships are attaching photo etch parts, these one's are tiny enough! A 1/200 New Jersey would get a frown from the wife if I brought that up ;)

Thanks for the comments, I've been digging through the Iowa thread for the past year.....at least now I've been using it for good use!

Brett

_________________
Brett Matthews


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Feb 17, 2015 12:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2010 5:00 pm
Posts: 297
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Here's my most recent updates, which aren't as much as I'd like to have accomplished. However, with winter having skipped Utah this year and 65 degree weekends, I've been outside a lot with the dogs and doing yard work!

Back to the ship though...

Working on more and more rails before I begin to attach details.....you can see broken rails, which have since been repaired

Image

Repaired.....I'll fill the gap between the rail and post as well

Image

High tech hold downs while gluing the rail

Image

Next might be Haze grey and deck painting, then to attach detail parts.....moving along, moving along.

Image

Thanks everyone for any comments or suggestions!

Brett

_________________
Brett Matthews


Last edited by Brett M on Thu Jul 13, 2017 4:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Feb 17, 2015 2:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2012 7:31 pm
Posts: 1287
Location: Macclesfield NC
Brett,
Very nice work there, PE looks really clean. Keep up the great work and looking forward to more progress on this build.

_________________
Jim Varnell
ABH2 USN/RET.
89-00

Eastern NC Modelworks

Up coming projects:
1/700 scale rebuild of diorama project 960 square feet.
(Table 1 underway)Feb.2017
1/350 USS ALASKA CB-1(started Aug. 2017) 70% completed


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Feb 18, 2015 12:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2010 5:00 pm
Posts: 297
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
JimVarnellABH2USN wrote:
Brett,
Very nice work there, PE looks really clean. Keep up the great work and looking forward to more progress on this build.


Thanks Jim, I appreciate the comments :)

_________________
Brett Matthews


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 261 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 14  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: johndon, Vladi and 15 guests


You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group