What-If How About a Purpose for the Old Carriers?

A place for "Never Weres" and "Might Have Beens"

Moderators: BB62vet, MartinJQuinn, Timmy C, Gernot, Olaf Held, Dan K, HMAS, ModelMonkey

Post Reply
User avatar
Sr. Gopher
Posts: 1091
Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 2:31 pm

What-If How About a Purpose for the Old Carriers?

Post by Sr. Gopher »

With ships like the Enterprise, Saratoga, Ranger, and about 150 CVEs surplus after the war, how about a good purpose for them after they finished their war careers. Also, with thousands of surplus C-47s, B-25s, and C-46s being used commercially, why not extend their range? How would using these ships as stationary Airports work? If they were placed around the world's Oceans, they would have opened the world even further to connection. The islands of the CVEs would just need to be taken off though.
Current builds:
Hobby Boss 1/700 Type VIIC U-Boat for my AH

Planned builds:
3 more 1/700 AH submarines
User avatar
Timmy C
Posts: 12472
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 6:00 pm
Location: Ottawa, Canada

Re: How About a Purpose for the Old Carriers?

Post by Timmy C »

Making all of those cargo planes sea- and carrier-worthy would be quite a chore; they'd have to be strengthened to take the stress of a carrier landing. Furthermore, the money and manpower needed to run those floating airports would likely make it an impractical exercise - it would be more efficient to just design and build more intercontinental-ranged aircraft that can use existing land-based airports.
De quoi s'agit-il?
User avatar
Sr. Gopher
Posts: 1091
Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 2:31 pm

Re: How About a Purpose for the Old Carriers?

Post by Sr. Gopher »

Yeah. True. Do ya think I can get away with saying that it was jus a joke?? :tongue: :joker:
Current builds:
Hobby Boss 1/700 Type VIIC U-Boat for my AH

Planned builds:
3 more 1/700 AH submarines
User avatar
Timmy C
Posts: 12472
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 6:00 pm
Location: Ottawa, Canada

Re: How About a Purpose for the Old Carriers?

Post by Timmy C »

It's probably not noon yet in Hawaii :P

Edit: Oh wait, yes it is! Erm, some spot of the Pacific, for your sake :P
De quoi s'agit-il?
User avatar
Sr. Gopher
Posts: 1091
Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 2:31 pm

Re: How About a Purpose for the Old Carriers?

Post by Sr. Gopher »

Oh well...It still is a nice idea, other than paying all of those stupid air fares. :joker: :tongue:
Current builds:
Hobby Boss 1/700 Type VIIC U-Boat for my AH

Planned builds:
3 more 1/700 AH submarines
User avatar
HMAS
Posts: 510
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 10:12 am
Location: long way SSE of Woomera

Re: How About a Purpose for the Old Carriers?

Post by HMAS »

join them altogether ie a pontoon bridge if you like.
Then you could drive over the oceans. :cool_2:
My job was to comfort the disturbed & Disturb the comfortable.
User avatar
Sr. Gopher
Posts: 1091
Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 2:31 pm

Re: How About a Purpose for the Old Carriers?

Post by Sr. Gopher »

HMAS wrote:join them altogether ie a pontoon bridge if you like.
Then you could drive over the oceans. :cool_2:
lol
Current builds:
Hobby Boss 1/700 Type VIIC U-Boat for my AH

Planned builds:
3 more 1/700 AH submarines
Russ2146
Posts: 2126
Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2009 9:28 pm
Location: Egg Harbor Twp, NJ

Re: How About a Purpose for the Old Carriers?

Post by Russ2146 »

The CVE's were built specifically to be CVEs, at least after the initial freighter conversions. They couldn't handle much more than a TBF/TBM on that size deck.

As to the C-47s, many are still flying. Military and civilian versions were upgraded to turbo-prop engines. The predecessor to the AC-130 gunship was the AC-47. Whever I fly to an island, I always check the more commercial, non-airline, areas of the field. I usually see some DC-3/C-47 being used for inter-island cargo.

On the other planes, many were used as fire bombers.

But you're right in one respect, much WW II military equipment from the Pacific never made it back to the US and was intentionally made unusable, after stripping, before the US pulled out. Most of the PTs were burned instead of being left to the islanders. Same thing with trucks and jeeps.
Russ
Seasick_remote

Re: How About a Purpose for the Old Carriers?

Post by Seasick_remote »

Saratoga was worn out seriously, as was Ranger. Enterprise would have made a decent LPH. Many CVE were converted into merchant service. Remove everything above the main deck was the first step.
commodore4
Posts: 267
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 1:50 pm

Re: How About a Purpose for the Old Carriers?

Post by commodore4 »

I had reason to be talking about some of the old carriers yesterday.The thing that sticks in my mind was a hull survey done on one ,with the idea of turning her into an offshore major medical center,and the flight deck would be retained aft to allow medivac choppers to land and take off.Would you believe that we put a sledge hammer through the shell plating just below the bilge keel???Now think a minute.This wasn,t all over the ship just in spots.As well as that we found spongy feeling steel under the flight deck at the midships location.When we cut a hole the steel just fell away in areas around the hole.Now this ship served her country well for many years.I do believe that mothball neglect and just plain fatigue caught up with her.It turned out to be cheaper to build this vessel out of a containership that just turned four and was sold by her company as being "old". The idea is sound for small aircraft and island nations but plain and simple it,s way to costly to take an old carrier and refit her for these duties.The cost would eat up maintenance and profit monies for too many years before it was cost effective. commodore 4
Post Reply

Return to “What-If”