What-If Bismark-class Carrier

A place for "Never Weres" and "Might Have Beens"

Moderators: BB62vet, MartinJQuinn, Timmy C, Gernot, Olaf Held, Dan K, HMAS, ModelMonkey

Post Reply
Guest

What-If Bismark-class Carrier

Post by Guest »

Okay here's my scenario...

In 1942, Germany lays down a third Bismark class ship but when they surrender, the incomplete hull is given to the US as war reprimandations. Only being completed up to the second deck, the US decide to build her as a carrier. She is given a hanger and a flight deck and a modified Esex class Island. The rest is up to you.
ingura

Re: What-if Bismark Class Carrier

Post by ingura »

....
Last edited by ingura on Sun Oct 31, 2010 6:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Sr. Gopher
Posts: 1091
Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 2:31 pm

Re: What-if Bismark Class Carrier

Post by Sr. Gopher »

It would be impractical, seeing that the US already had enough carriers. Maybe Germany would get permission to make it a carrier from their conquerors. Or, the Soviet Union. The idea is a good one, but the US and Britain would not even try to. I'm thinking the most likely would be France though. They would probably request it be built in the US, so you could peculate that it would look very much like a US carrier.
Current builds:
Hobby Boss 1/700 Type VIIC U-Boat for my AH

Planned builds:
3 more 1/700 AH submarines
User avatar
USS California BB44
Posts: 582
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 7:17 pm

Re: What-if Bismark Class Carrier

Post by USS California BB44 »

Okay so it's built in the US for France... Anyone have any drawings to throw around? I'm thinking Essex style island with a single 5''/38 superfiring over a twin mount with an enlarged Independence class flight deck.
Current Builds:
1-350 DKM Z-39
1-350 USS Philippine Sea
User avatar
Seasick
Posts: 1550
Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2005 8:58 pm
Location: Houston, Texas

Re: What-if Bismark Class Carrier

Post by Seasick »

France would have finished her themselves, however they would have purchased equipment and technical support from the USN and Royal Navy. The scenario has a problem in that Bismarck's machinery was large and the hull was not optimal for it. The ship would have been scrapped by anyone who took it.

As a theoretical exercise, take a Bismarck class 1/700 kit and build the hull. and then take measurements to figure out how large a hanger you could fit on top of it. Build it as a commando/helecoptor carrier.
???????
? Seasick?
???????
User avatar
Sr. Gopher
Posts: 1091
Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 2:31 pm

Re: What-if Bismark Class Carrier

Post by Sr. Gopher »

An LPH sounds good to me! I don't have the Bismarck kit, so I can't really say much about it, but I can say that a ship that size could hold say about 2,000 soldiers. That would mean approximately 35 helos would be needed.


I do have another idea, but it's not a carrier: A missile battleship. I know, I know, it's kind of strange hearing the words "missile" and "battleship" from me in the same sentence, but with the Stalingrad and K-1000 rumors of the time, like the Kentucky, it would be considered as a possible candidate for conversion.
Current builds:
Hobby Boss 1/700 Type VIIC U-Boat for my AH

Planned builds:
3 more 1/700 AH submarines
User avatar
USS California BB44
Posts: 582
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 7:17 pm

Re: What-if Bismark Class Carrier

Post by USS California BB44 »

I've got an extra Bismark hull floating around somewhere. I'll have to see if I can dig it out soon. This may take a while though.
Dragon Scharnhorst is a greater priority. :woo_hoo: :woo_hoo:
Current Builds:
1-350 DKM Z-39
1-350 USS Philippine Sea
James Hood
Posts: 65
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 9:25 am

Re: What-if Bismark Class Carrier

Post by James Hood »

Seasick, would you please elaborate on Bismarck's machinery being too large and the hull not optimized for it?

Intriguing concept. Thank you.
Post Reply

Return to “What-If”