JCRAY wrote:I think the photo's of the bomb damage to the number 9 gun casement of Pennsylvania posted on NavSource pretty much settle the issue.
That may pretty much settle it�for Pennsylvania. As we all know, there are plenty of visible differences between the two ships and there is no guarantee that what was the case on Pennsylvania was also the case on Arizona and vice versa. Arizona and Pennsylvania were refitted at different yards and it is very possible that the decking in this area could be different on the two ships.
Tim Reynaga wrote:
And there are those the archaeological survey drawings of the Arizona wreck done by the National Park Service. They do show what appears to be planking, though the place where the deck fragments are drawn could well be decking from the superstructure deck level above the casemates; those same drawings show this area to have partially collapsed into the upper deck level which contained the guns. And of course however carefully done, these drawings are at best secondary sources.
I do not believe that the areas of wood decking shown on the drawing are collapsed superstructure deck. If you refer to Stillwell�s book, on page 256 there is a 1942 photograph looking down from the main mast on to the superstructure deck. The areas of the deck to the left of stack, above where the planking is shown on the drawings, are intact and above water; later these areas of deck were cut away and removed as shown on page 260. Also note that in this photograph all the wood planking has been removed from the superstructure deck, if there were remnants of the deck in this area there would be no wood on it. The only collapsed area of the superstructure deck remaining on the ship appears to be forward in the vicinity of the conning tower and empty 1.1 tubs.
If anyone has questions regarding the accuracy and veracity of the park service survey this document describes the methodology used:
http://www.library.arizona.edu/exhibits ... z_arch.htm
There is also an annotated drawing showing more detail, and labeling these areas as teak deck, here:
http://www.nps.gov/archive/usar/scrs/fig38b.jpg
I would think that a well documented survey of the actual ship would be considered a primary source. Unless someone has an alternate explanation for the planking shown on the park service drawings, it appears to me that the preponderance of actual evidence relating to Arizona, at least that I am aware of, is that the casemate decks were planked.